From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-124556-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1QZOF9-0004eQ-DQ
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:17:23 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B093E1C1D2;
	Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:14:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qw0-f53.google.com (mail-qw0-f53.google.com [209.85.216.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8146B1C1D2
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:14:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by qwb7 with SMTP id 7so549078qwb.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=blKUoqCKmkN+LKKfrf0kkqsNXmj8BsSbO7BBrMkz1Xc=;
        b=R8wKs+Njnl+4tMlTCd0SE5jaBWzrK+xCQQo9qUeXQ4ATbveg0yoK7BND9y3QQTaDZb
         pXL2rUm5sbC7T52kiNOzewgfCa2HkQWlcqhv4oU6h3+D7LxdT3MmwUURNS/09SaaUZWV
         9rs+r5K5TX/zbBTqjW8OJyJs+yh+Pd+G/OA7I=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=Q+zDUHIbYGFct6iI5QU2zjkb7SU9pDnNPqnWU+caNWEeb3WCeVaUfGSe6uB8r6LINN
         WM+aFC4TynOZzU+SARXmE1QP4KJqAOumbPksO3wrg19ba8EF+ACfIlXp2shzyk/0615X
         RELJwjeqKlGJe+FyZv/kIElQaLNf/zFsxuMYk=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.195.198 with SMTP id ed6mr578189qab.228.1308752088966;
 Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.61.14 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E01EF3F.8040800@gmail.com>
References: <4E0167C4.9080100@gmail.com>
	<its1qd$jub$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<4E01CF99.1070109@gmail.com>
	<itsq3p$9fg$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<4E01EF3F.8040800@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:14:48 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTimZDUQwXGft8OJHKkK+XLkqg6g9Qw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now?
From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: 798fa365860182bfca577d953c1a9c44

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
<SNIP>
> Well, it appeared to only affect gcc here.

As it should?

c2stable ~ # equery hasuse fortran
 * Searching for USE flag fortran ...
[IP-] [  ] sys-devel/gcc-4.4.5:4.4
c2stable ~ #