From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QQ2AE-0004QD-J5 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 27 May 2011 18:53:38 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2151F1C06A; Fri, 27 May 2011 18:51:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vx0-f181.google.com (mail-vx0-f181.google.com [209.85.220.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B221C06A for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 18:51:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vxb39 with SMTP id 39so2004854vxb.40 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 11:51:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=X6miHuyzsfcrUDWrTU8USgGoL4LDA6ClXMs0WDSncfI=; b=WN1ONDcsdthMt7O5uiSbeM92k4Mw+iKTQN/KBUOIZlOAx+NMl+tbh8BMyR5VgeEec9 i6MAZK+1/P2dffDfnIAcZATrUZeir3pElaI5DYupuNpLuza23hnnILv55L74/zuRKb10 S840earDjHWU602MVTtXgM+KuvcA2O273iavU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=enAtRH1DHOGEDFgyhzohdFlDiiSthEy8e4P3xKPBuDO5kZAmgDJS0wN/McgSUbQaVu D4eq5DcTLXwS49NV43/36AbS8k/6GI/y6VZrJGMtttdu/EmECKhrFpREm+qDt7o5GaLK diCtFeh0BO7MyzG37PDAxFoSsfRmV/NQADcpI= Received: by 10.52.180.201 with SMTP id dq9mr3475701vdc.245.1306522313268; Fri, 27 May 2011 11:51:53 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: paul.hartman@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.157.234 with HTTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 11:51:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <874o4g3yas.fsf@eps142.cdf.udc.es> References: <874o4g3yas.fsf@eps142.cdf.udc.es> From: Paul Hartman Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:51:33 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: rp2U7Y6Ae8k3F2GvwhbYGvR4Xfg Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] ebuild not inserting soname, therefore emerging zlib fails To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 1e4c59c4c9de500045bec0469209dbb0 On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Alberto Luaces wrote: > Hello, > > I have searched quite a bit for an error I'm having when emerging > current zlib-1.2.5-r2. The problem is that somehow the soname is not > written in the .so file, and the build process fails. I attach all the > build logs in case I have some obvious misconfiguration that I should be > aware of. I have not changed my CHOSTS or things like that. > > I recompiled the previous version and happened the same, but it seems > at that time not having a soname was not forbidden by the ebuild and I > got just a QA notice. > > If I try to compile zlib from the /var/tmp/portage... directory the > library compiles fine and, in addition, the soname is included this > time. I tried to trace the eclasses in order to know what was happening > but I couldn't. Hi, Based on your settings I am guessing you have used distcc in the past, even though you have disabled it now. I think zlib's configure makes some changes based on if it thinks you use distcc or not. I would try to unset CC in environment and remove -m32 from your CFLAGS and see if it is any different. It's only a guess and you can change it back if it doesn't work. I would also select again your preferences in gcc-config and binutils-config, run env-update and source /etc/profile just to be sure everything is in working order. :)