From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-121580-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1Q9XHl-0003mL-Vu
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 06:41:14 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A7D71C008;
Tue, 12 Apr 2011 06:39:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qy0-f174.google.com (mail-qy0-f174.google.com [209.85.216.174])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E12211C008
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 06:39:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so1775741qyk.19
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 23:39:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
bh=Xs/ZMpGcOo4nx9HKWdrpz2Bww0UDg749M9kUPImjfHM=;
b=dwwUOhkz089Mcre5+sYCh5QX2HdXoMpXMNWSGGc73pdOxycB7/P2HrTyg6mopBK8nf
eYswxribFA/RY6lWbqXGQr6oSIeR7/9oo0fgAUOXFPJ4x6q4N4mMxwDFRo+y77O4T0rQ
aAVjTaESLXx7g135J4huSJuZW192jDTfqlFZI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:content-type;
b=xyEyyhsUd8Njkxwck2wcsTX7NQk8nluSoy6GvTCbXGyFV9TrVNCBDEwf7XWjnmlo7y
UvO6aka9HBWmYuhKFWxWKKfoN6VhlUZYfPYXXCwic4mDejx3Wrdab5qo7TRwQ42/qYvF
CapcLOizsmIuL74FXJ7MIYVShJ4tClilrmlpw=
Received: by 10.224.187.73 with SMTP id cv9mr4886593qab.26.1302590391182; Mon,
11 Apr 2011 23:39:51 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.28.136 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 23:39:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4D9CE6EC.80704@orlitzky.com>
References: <BANLkTikMT0NiXzD03t5EpbqUjCFQhdgicQ@mail.gmail.com>
<BANLkTim0fs9puHwN4T=vyfHQ-1-jFMpQdQ@mail.gmail.com> <4D9CE6EC.80704@orlitzky.com>
From: Kfir Lavi <lavi.kfir@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 09:39:31 +0300
Message-ID: <BANLkTikeAStb=Euu9weBhfL_5xLsbW_s1g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: qemu-kvm black screen and infinite loop on startup
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30334e858de60c04a0b2f572
X-Archives-Salt:
X-Archives-Hash: d97a14478c4f8e3733101a93373ac3a7
--20cf30334e858de60c04a0b2f572
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Michael Orlitzky <michael@orlitzky.com>wrote:
> On 04/06/2011 07:45 AM, Kfir Lavi wrote:
> >
> > When I run qemu -no-kvm things work as expected under hardened kernel.
> > Using regular kernel (none hardened) qemu works ok.
> > So, the problem is running qemu under hardened kernel.
> >
> > If someone have some input, I'll be happy to hear it.
> >
>
> I am a long-time user of qemu/kvm under hardened. It works off and on.
>
> I don't have any scientific advice for you, only this: if you ever find
> a combination of kernel/qemu that works, *don't change anything*.
>
> Well, thanks for this advice. hehe
I booted a none hardened kernel, and qemu started to work again.
So yes, the hardened kernel is to blame.
I wonder why qemu have problem with hardened kernel?
Maybe some of the hardened devs can pitch in....
Regards,
Kfir
--20cf30334e858de60c04a0b2f572
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at =
1:19 AM, Michael Orlitzky <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:michael@o=
rlitzky.com">michael@orlitzky.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote clas=
s=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px soli=
d rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class=3D"im">On 04/06/2011 07:45 AM, Kfir Lavi wrote:<br>
><br>
> When I run qemu -no-kvm things work as expected under hardened kernel.=
<br>
> Using regular kernel (none hardened) qemu works ok.<br>
> So, the problem is running qemu under hardened kernel.<br>
><br>
> If someone have some input, I'll be happy to hear it.<br>
><br>
<br>
</div>I am a long-time user of qemu/kvm under hardened. It works off and on=
.<br>
<br>
I don't have any scientific advice for you, only this: if you ever find=
<br>
a combination of kernel/qemu that works, *don't change anything*.<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>Well, thanks for this advice. hehe<br>I booted a none ha=
rdened kernel, and qemu started to work again.<br>So yes, the hardened kern=
el is to blame. <br>I wonder why qemu have problem with hardened kernel?<br=
>
Maybe some of the hardened devs can pitch in....<br><br>Regards,<br>Kfir<br=
></div>
--20cf30334e858de60c04a0b2f572--