From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-124748-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1Qa2Xb-00089e-A6
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:19:13 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5BF981C0A7;
Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:16:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qw0-f53.google.com (mail-qw0-f53.google.com [209.85.216.53])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A1071C0A7
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:16:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by qwb7 with SMTP id 7so1754836qwb.40
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 02:16:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=ypH3eAiTWcfQ7IgybiN5mynJ0Nxs0kRPWMFTKm91wGM=;
b=guIblNUSVz5oL+SLTntRGXmaAsbUWZRLjWkNBpHi23dNiGgD1GDjkEbXwxRle+Q9+A
eyx4NnK+pZBHYukPi7J0BmDJ9ZCQEO1B/ZKusNLjpKxRPJNSa3UJoMchlZC99GQm1ADG
Z5cwFvxTrTNxD8s38wsFhaQdunrEbfOH/ccAk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
b=v21CC9uKzc24XoKBmm+mKUWGeNmeOFNITuceNA4owDqzg+t0LKwRv93CsSIWHQMZmV
bHQWCs97jEF+/RPfIHg/O1NjALt0+xuhdPogtZOFU0oQyDljOEDeMZMThzIG1DDBdNIs
86iTFwc1v/WNCzyYYB1dDCrZYAQcSuxKHAEE8=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.21.75 with SMTP id i11mr2281381qcb.277.1308906961972; Fri,
24 Jun 2011 02:16:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.245.78 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 02:16:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 19:16:01 +1000
Message-ID: <BANLkTikUPLSWOHVukFWVHRsZqjkOAny34A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-user] N wireless speeds
From: Adam Carter <adamcarter3@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt:
X-Archives-Hash: 936ef095b0d229c2c65f7b7acacd601e
On my Intel 5100 (iwlagn) laptop;
wlan0 IEEE 802.11abgn ESSID:"virus.exe"
Mode:Managed Frequency:2.437 GHz Access Point: xx:yy:zz:B3:2B:E9
Bit Rate=65 Mb/s Tx-Power=15 dBm
Link Quality=70/70 Signal level=-32 dBm
The TPLink WN951N (atheros AR5008, ath9k) AP has;
Wiphy phy0
Band 1:
HT capabilities: 0x104e
* 20/40 MHz operation
* SM PS disabled
* 40 MHz short GI
* max A-MSDU len 3839
* DSSS/CCK 40 MHz
HT A-MPDU factor: 0x0003 (65535 bytes)
HT A-MPDU density: 0x0006 (8 usec)
So i've configured hostapd.conf;
hw_mode=g
wme_enabled=1
ieee80211n=1
ht_capab=[SHORT-GI-40][DSSS_CCK-40]
Does my configuration look optimal? Is the 65Mb/s all i should expect
to get? I'm already on the least used channel (5 other APs in range).