From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QMr2n-0000U8-N1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 19 May 2011 00:24:50 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA57A1C060; Thu, 19 May 2011 00:23:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qw0-f53.google.com (mail-qw0-f53.google.com [209.85.216.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95FA31C060 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 00:23:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwb7 with SMTP id 7so1396909qwb.40 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:23:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=UmZdQ8cKUF+UrzojLWPIwJssAHN+eNY1VNZ5zSF/JDs=; b=wVTsHwOj7xgTXIW7ywv0B92kIk8P3j9NiW0hlifaKihFSujEUijmaRK1AHdGHK0jN2 08cW/KQJp3PqePBCtFwDkT1OmUvTF/iJSos1ExTSiLrk5rvKXwG7q+uAYFZMVgPMs7t8 4vmaVnJAN5kiQu+WvZAXChKCwLWKqffdU13kQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=K6s5nPE1w3YrvjQja2zirbXlDkSQsff1eYJA4jOtC4Pm/QAGD6UPDXQIIn5i2o/mmX dtdVD5sWl6tduzgYv8sUBceRBj4sun7cy3yRkWOc7NcUiDPLXH3XOCCg5Pgmxh7PLWua lJjPlaFbZA4613xkEfPdb0pjTdyNAEIXmVC2Y= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.114.77 with SMTP id d13mr1927799qcq.219.1305764591026; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:23:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.215.20 with HTTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:23:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201105181757.56139.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> References: <201105181757.56139.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 10:23:10 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Flash lockups From: Adam Carter To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd6aa449bc2d904a3960256 X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: f655f620626705d922a0bc5331f2ec1f --000e0cd6aa449bc2d904a3960256 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > I upgraded to openrc 10 days ago and didn't notice anything untoward, but > after a few days Firefox 3.6.17 started reporting that it couldn't find > Flash. (I only use Flash for the BBC I-Player service.) I tried Opera, > Chrome and Seamonkey, and they either said the same or just sat and looked > at me when asked to stream audio. > I'm amd64 too, but run ~amd64 for flash and Firefox. 10.2 was a real piece of crap, but 10.3 has just hit portage and it seems fine so far. On a related note, who's using gnash (which is in portage), or lightspark (in portage but masked)? Are they drop in replacements for flash? As they're source I imagine they may be a better alternative for amd64 than the 32 bit adobe player. --000e0cd6aa449bc2d904a3960256 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I upgraded to openrc 10 days ago and didn't notice anything untoward, b= ut
after a few days Firefox 3.6.17 started reporting that it couldn't find=
Flash. (I only use Flash for the BBC I-Player service.) I tried Opera,
Chrome and Seamonkey, and they either said the same or just sat and looked<= br> at me when asked to stream audio.

I'm amd64 t= oo, but run ~amd64 for flash and Firefox. 10.2 was a real piece of crap, bu= t 10.3 has just hit portage and it seems fine so far.

On a related n= ote, who's using gnash (which is in portage), or lightspark (in portage= but masked)? Are they drop in replacements for flash? As they're sourc= e I imagine they may be a better alternative for amd64 than the 32 bit adob= e player.
--000e0cd6aa449bc2d904a3960256--