From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QQp9U-00081I-IV for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 29 May 2011 23:12:08 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 68C0F1C0B2; Sun, 29 May 2011 23:09:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gy0-f181.google.com (mail-gy0-f181.google.com [209.85.160.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 314FF1C0B2 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 23:09:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyh4 with SMTP id 4so1835258gyh.40 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 16:09:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=r5yQuPaeQb4QTPj2sCZL+02GZ9ySprQWzlMzlu8Kgys=; b=Kn9cbDD9h2AK8nHKMwZpjLnOI1PbksyzZKw4ZOc4HGWK7T72Op3SAHENIee31mmM4u +i4hhPHWCTbhUBKGUwVDKMKBMyj0Zc8QqlejKPaxz8NOwY7pk3luLcJI038wSfz6/S+j ODSUb/zY2r3jZdSeoobD6x7CNJcrbF+PWdM9w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=nLhmKh7mFVoxlamWSgdiny9i+xw4lWFDC0BjYoIZPxEDy/5R74dXNusFAKFUlmoRfb 25xTQzS0EeEIgU9kVJNz1NnQL6PxGSK/zZhVGvVtT++bqwWkjbgx+4WQUWy1O9ZpayjN NfTJnsJOAxS11UEC4k54bpU7AQn74fkKrjJHc= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.137.12 with SMTP id k12mr2676871and.92.1306710588560; Sun, 29 May 2011 16:09:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.96.7 with HTTP; Sun, 29 May 2011 16:09:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201105300011.27742.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> References: <201105292257.22071.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <201105292256.31682.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <201105300011.27742.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 19:09:48 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Install issue From: Colleen Beamer To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e644c5e674947704a472446d X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 09601472d9e4820a0ead8de777d73137 --0016e644c5e674947704a472446d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > Apparently, though unproven, at 23:56 on Sunday 29 May 2011, Mick did opine > thusly: > > > > I wonder if you haven't just tripped over a bug in baselayout or recent > > > stage3's. I just did a new install here but used an old stage3 that was > > > still baselayout-1. I did not run into the issues you did. What does > > > b.g.o. say? > > > > I'm sure that I've come across the same problem some time in the distant > > past and had to create these two nodes manually. > > > > However, it should be easy to prove if this is a bug or not - look in the > > stage3 tar file for /dev/console and /dev/null? > > True enough recent stage 3 tarballs for amd64 on my mirror are either > faulty > or do not contain /dev/console. > > May 20 and 26 are faulty > > April 28 is OK > > Colleen, you should follow the tip you found on Google to fix this. What > stage > 3 did you download and use? > Actually, I used the most recent one - I think May 26th, However, my first install (that I screwed up on was the May 25th one, but I got the same message. Don't know if it makes a difference, but I used a tarball for x86. Think I'll try the fix that I found on google first before attempting to find a stage 3 tarball that is not faulty. BTW, I can't recall from previous installs when I'm supposed to do this, but I thought that baselayout got emerged somewhere during the install prior to rebooting. There was no place in the handbook that mentioned installing baselayout ...... and yes, I did read the news item about baselayout2 and openrc migration. Regards, Colleen > > > > -- > alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com > > --0016e644c5e674947704a472446d Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Alan McKinnon <= span dir=3D"ltr"><alan.mckinn= on@gmail.com> wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at = 23:56 on Sunday 29 May 2011, Mick did opine
thusly:

> > I wonder if you haven't just tripped ov= er a bug in baselayout or recent
> > stage3's. I just did a ne= w install here but used an old stage3 that was
> > still baselayou= t-1. I did not run into the issues you did. What does
> > b.g.o. say?
>
> I'm sure that I've come acros= s the same problem some time in the distant
> past =A0and had to crea= te these two nodes manually.
>
> However, it should be easy to = prove if this is a bug or not - look in the
> stage3 tar file for /dev/console and /dev/null?

True enou= gh recent stage 3 tarballs for amd64 on my mirror are either faulty
or d= o not contain /dev/console.

May 20 and 26 are faulty

April 28= is OK

Colleen, you should follow the tip you found on Google to fix this. Wha= t stage
3 did you download and use?
=A0
Actually, I used the most recent one - I think May 26th,=A0 However, m= y first install (that I screwed up on was the May 25th one, but I got the s= ame message.=A0 Don't know if it makes a difference, but I used a tarba= ll for x86.
=A0
Think I'll try the fix that I found on google first before attempt= ing to find a stage 3 tarball that is not faulty.
=A0
BTW, I can't recall from previous installs when I'm supposed t= o do this, but I thought that baselayout got emerged somewhere during the i= nstall prior to rebooting.=A0 There was no place in the handbook that menti= oned installing baselayout ...... and yes, I did read the news=A0item about= baselayout2 and openrc migration.
=A0
Regards,
=A0
Colleen
=A0
=A0



--
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
<= br>

--0016e644c5e674947704a472446d--