From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QcGe5-0002rh-G8 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:47:01 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 999521C004; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:45:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647BF1C004 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:45:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D10CD64230 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:45:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=1.697, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hi1dwBx5LYSY for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:45:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f49.google.com (mail-bw0-f49.google.com [209.85.214.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 165741B4029 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:45:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwf12 with SMTP id 12so2413679bwf.36 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 05:44:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jb/3Xl9HdsmMeN1eNHtT3U2RLZ5aqCyraXChtA0VSE0=; b=immPcCpSwbx8wWhO4qrk7RtH2szFKThmUstmzdilokDlCGj0Ifgh3JppqgOkHOw9XO CakcvqLpwJBeAVhROVpPozyj22TLY90qa5mI1gotngObH62KsxSvtCN7XnG6qA/1QJmi 8e2fnCFDLINcKWG5/Mfyd/8YPikNkrmq0lwWw= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.128.90 with SMTP id j26mr1896990bks.116.1309437009292; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 05:30:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.52.79 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 05:30:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:30:09 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: [gentoo-user] KDE and eye candy From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOhcyBDc8Ohbnlp?= To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: dd372f52b81076d88210e584e91ecdaf Hi All, I like KDE and I use it on daily basis. I would like to change the style of the windows but if the eye candy stuffs are disabled only the original theme is working properly. What does it mean "working properly"? In this case means that the parts of the windows are well drawn according to design. Design of the window buttons on the upper-right corner are drawn properly, not hided, they are not blinking, etc. The cause is simple why I turned off the eye candy stuffs, they are hungry and eating my CPU. This is a little bit strange for me because I have a reasonable nVidia video card with 512Mbyte RAM and my system is well configured. My question is that, it is normal when the eye candy stuffs are disabled only the original style is working properly? Should I give you screenshots about the not proper working to clarify what is my problem? Should I report this as bug in bugs.gentoo.org? Thanks for any help in advance! Andr=C3=A1s --=20 - - --=C2=A0 Csanyi Andras (Sayusi Ando)=C2=A0 -- http://sayusi.hu -- http://facebook.com/andras.csanyi --=C2=A0 ""Trust in God and keep your gunpowder dry!" - Cromwell