public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] virtualbox + kernel panic 2.6.38-r2
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 12:55:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTik5r7un9Sd93EQUrAAmmwWeK0Zf3w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DE53D70.9040000@libertytrek.org>

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@libertytrek.org> wrote:
> On 2011-05-31 1:31 PM, James wrote:
>> The only thing I've read online that may be applicable is that there
>> have been some issues with kernel panics when you give the guest OS
>> more than 1 processor. It would suck badly if SMP didn't work well on
>> vbox.
>
> My understanding is it is a general rule that you never give any VM more
> than one processor, regardless of which vm hypervisor you are running...
>
>
My platform is a Gentoo i7-980 Extreme processor so I have 12 CPUs (6
cores * 2 for hyperthreading)

In Virtualbox I'm running both Gentoo and Win 7 VMs, each allocated 4
processors. In Win 7 I have one app that uses everything it can find
so when it's running all 4 processors are 100% utilized. In Linux I
see the CPU usage at 33%. Win 7 is sluggish when this app is running
as it hogs from the system

In VMWare Player I'm running Win XP VMs with 2 processors. None of my
apps in XP use more than 1 processor. XP itself is quite responsive
even when these apps are using 1 of the 2 processors dedicated the the
VM.

I seldom run more than 1 app in any Windows VM as I don't trust
Windows. I've not had any problems with any of these VMs that I'd
associate with using multiple cores.

And yes, I do own these Windows licenses. VMs keep that money useful
until some day some Linux apps come along that do what these do for me
in Windows.

- Mark



  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-31 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-31 17:31 [gentoo-user] virtualbox + kernel panic 2.6.38-r2 James
2011-05-31 19:11 ` Tanstaafl
2011-05-31 19:55   ` Mark Knecht [this message]
2011-06-01  5:17     ` Mick
2011-06-01 17:44       ` James
2011-06-01 18:52         ` Mark Knecht
2011-06-01 19:33           ` James
2011-06-01 19:48             ` Mark Knecht
2011-05-31 19:56   ` kashani
2011-06-01  5:09 ` Valmor de Almeida

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BANLkTik5r7un9Sd93EQUrAAmmwWeK0Zf3w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=markknecht@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox