From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-124627-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1QZWcX-0006tI-UW
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:14:06 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7DE4B1C1E1;
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:12:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qw0-f53.google.com (mail-qw0-f53.google.com [209.85.216.53])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DEDF1C1F5
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:12:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by qwb7 with SMTP id 7so859334qwb.40
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=wXP8w36X/ho49nLSdrZHkXaTkajjNIF+6CVv95YTI+k=;
b=w1poNcZ5pnW6lHyP42YQsSyHPB9OD/b7hR1QvV+bgHSRLwLtrjgL/zKupW+NXHJPuo
4XwPOxm6hH6uUG8Oun/AB5SqP0KkqcvBYfS6Iq2SV7lLVaJbdptTLSQ+aCEwtKBlQV2Q
6SRYCXMBw6SbX5xwnNetDu46aVqqVjexdEuDI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=KiYHcpqb4XZrw+8mrHmN9TEYxQG/JEvqBVmTBY2DE8YKs3iQrg5WS7nHm9HjLh9ycu
i6ZUTCGH/69i9Sh5smozUU5tWAsgXcYPHoeaI/MZKAKKLN07yjnbhUk/CQBpyEPhhIbI
bN8rWk1VhoBk7K3DNA9tOJ4pV0vtA8L0NOSqI=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.218.72 with SMTP id hp8mr1118709qab.78.1308784348777; Wed,
22 Jun 2011 16:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.61.14 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E026D2D.5070707@gmail.com>
References: <4E0167C4.9080100@gmail.com>
<its1qd$jub$1@dough.gmane.org>
<4E01CF99.1070109@gmail.com>
<itsq3p$9fg$1@dough.gmane.org>
<4E01EF3F.8040800@gmail.com>
<itstuq$3am$1@dough.gmane.org>
<4E020BA4.50201@gmail.com>
<itt46d$cnf$1@dough.gmane.org>
<BANLkTi=e-9=JLh=LVYzhpfT+P7-wdek1Cw@mail.gmail.com>
<4E026D2D.5070707@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:12:28 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=hyCJzyZaBtPR4YLd_su3_9Xj6hA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now?
From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt:
X-Archives-Hash: 85f36fe95aeb99136425d44742b8e675
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
<SNIP>
>
> I emerge -C ifc and revdep-rebuild rebuilt some stuff but it is gone now.
> =C2=A0So, you may have to work with it but it *might* be removable too.
>
> Dale
Hi Dale,
For me this was more about following along with the thread and
learning about this flag. I had no real intention of changing
anything. I do use R in Windows & sometimes in Linux so apparently I
need a Fortran compiler. I see no advantage and many disadvantages to
switching to ifc from gcc-fortran so I'll just leave things alone.
Cheers,
Mark