From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-123091-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1QOHLs-0008A6-To for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 22 May 2011 22:42:25 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C778E0459; Sun, 22 May 2011 22:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC431E0459 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 22 May 2011 22:40:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm8 with SMTP id 8so4459539fxm.40 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 22 May 2011 15:40:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=zyQGm9CLDZumUGYJ42kdXGsAUWXb3iJfLDdLBO7a+zs=; b=O4EF/z13+hNKInwVe6PbYxbVTvL1HuiP2DBxLTd/7KE0xiej+WwGsn9R6ejNoSnKwy zr5ULv4Zk35MFpLbFQYrSLcrokRvpj36cSvuCzOJpT/vSko86cE3ClQCjOgEgCOSK49w 95d0GlF+J3w2yWMX506Y9uGDelQJcs3+ztp+w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=eNBxn/Kp7pwgURFa6cJkt4JkdEHnPY+saIXpmG/AQLfzK0EObcOy87/lFLnpPRSclN dWYiWWjpNX5nYLTvjywJvcj/ee4T+GY+D+CS0Z642aA8ZDBTowKAxRm5Q71XoAgoWq5k bkTVuCNp1m8x+38YmeY2qIImk6Ioj+sE9YlOE= Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.6.71 with SMTP id 7mr1738006fay.14.1306104046099; Sun, 22 May 2011 15:40:46 -0700 (PDT) Sender: comprookie2000@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.148.79 with HTTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 15:40:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110522221108.GA16775@gaurahari.merseine.nu> References: <gVmch-4xA-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <gVmch-4xA-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <gVmch-4xA-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <gVoxs-8ns-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <20110522221108.GA16775@gaurahari.merseine.nu> Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 18:40:46 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: lzw8XggzdIIHQjW2B4eP0ULRvKQ Message-ID: <BANLkTi=diWwM2p_ob_yc+PyZVLcjq2nd_A@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [HEADSUP] [FIXED] libreoffice versus bison-2.5 From: David Abbott <david@pythontoo.com> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 3bb0b60734e8dac6803c8fe51449e456 Its been fixed; http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/app-office/libreoffice/ChangeLog?view=markup