From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QKCLu-0005S6-Ug for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:33:36 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E1EBAE03E4; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:32:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f53.google.com (mail-ew0-f53.google.com [209.85.215.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93FC1E03E4 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:32:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy8 with SMTP id 8so227710ewy.40 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 09:32:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7Wwddn4TR/jids+/NP194fEmA7JrOC764yTNcd1kDmg=; b=R/QRlXLQS9cWbtVRsOcg1gMFYiKEhGEQPB1zZyRtTsU59fz2GtMEnxW+hrbRM225sD sl5FlZaq92akd2Riry1HpiP0XTNYqVJxKe4KCfwSM+FtUN77CgyYApBZ56hvZtsmc37Y MTUsKs0rNFIK4D3o63FEquDEaTCjdan+g66p4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=XFdAU7wSoJX7Q1inoXSjTo/mhLa8Q3tDGG4sMuLrDKWPIafRMEU99nf5ImYI1kMd6X cnNVcThICXcX3GzbwOpriLPQV+AnFrBy6IgE6+ZfB0foo4TgtFBt7UqjZs/DYDIvQV5Y QH6cN83mUtQfEWkh0t5JANudUrGY7RpO6Nfns= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.16.143 with SMTP id h15mr447679eeh.245.1305131523391; Wed, 11 May 2011 09:32:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.29.1 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 09:32:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DCAB177.8020102@gmail.com> References: <4DC9B435.9010308@gmail.com> <4DCAB177.8020102@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 11:32:03 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] How's the openrc update going for everyone? From: James Wall To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 6b7e33502015abd27e891596499484d7 On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Dale wrote: > Mark Knecht wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Dale =A0wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> I was curious, what's the results of the openrc update for people that >>> have >>> done theirs? =A0Is it pretty simple and "just works" or are there issue= s? >>> =A0I'm >>> mostly interested in x86 and amd64 since that is what I have. =A0Just a >>> simple >>> works here and I'm X86 or amd64 would be nice. =A0List issues if you ha= d >>> any. >>> >>> Thanks for the feedback. >>> >>> Dale >>> >>> :-) =A0:-) >>> >> >> Hi Dale, >> =A0 =A0I've now done 5 stable machines - 4 hardware and 1 VM. I haven't >> had any significant problems on any of them. The update takes well >> less that 30 minutes and, for me anyway, has been relatively pain free >> compared to other historic Gentoo upgrades. >> >> Cheers, >> Mark >> >> > > Yep. =A0I agree. =A0Of all the things that have caused problems in the pa= st, > this was a doozy. =A0It had the potential to really bork a system. =A0It = appears > to have been a very easy one. =A0I don't think anyone had a REALLY big pr= oblem > with this upgrade. =A0The devs made sure all the ducks was in line on thi= s > one. =A0Yeppie for that. > > Dale > > :-) =A0:-) > > I remember expat and e2fsprogs breaking spectacularly with no warning whatsoever back when.... That was fun. This update is a complete opposite from those nightmares. James Wall