From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-124584-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1QZQJU-0000w3-Nq
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:30:00 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 88D511C073;
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:23:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qy0-f174.google.com (mail-qy0-f174.google.com [209.85.216.174])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584DC1C0C8
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:23:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by qyk29 with SMTP id 29so2799173qyk.19
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:23:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=fn/xd2UidtmodzyUYGmzPask/fs6AFBwifhwxwYkqNQ=;
b=YdllU3iwvfo/HdlomXIJjT0ecUu/QHIm9duqNrTz/13G7Yt4KXWN7Kiak4esFFp2CI
0kwANmnLWKhLWSIV6jXyGL4jBA3j1edqPXV5lpjjdkmdWTY18+Yh277Wwm4c6SwJUhFJ
+lMxmP3Hn59JON88fosQKaXMl22MmFnJgCuj0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=Wn36N1Rp7x1gCjd+7otGmWTg5uqTGErB4G7f4Qzw+y4HtorFTHCojLttkvYjcpH6HK
Q/2ZHeF/MGn8nyeAacGaULpahD/GJeYcodAgZVx8EaXdyRtLyAczhd0fxAt1XYB/UN51
FhrjJMyrgQO2zQ9yb4VFbCEDOCke7F56nqark=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.67.72 with SMTP id q8mr553201qai.278.1308759824758; Wed,
22 Jun 2011 09:23:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.61.14 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:23:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <itt46d$cnf$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <4E0167C4.9080100@gmail.com>
<its1qd$jub$1@dough.gmane.org>
<4E01CF99.1070109@gmail.com>
<itsq3p$9fg$1@dough.gmane.org>
<4E01EF3F.8040800@gmail.com>
<itstuq$3am$1@dough.gmane.org>
<4E020BA4.50201@gmail.com>
<itt46d$cnf$1@dough.gmane.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:23:44 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=AOSHDj2umYGFnaaOOMqw5zGpU8w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now?
From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt:
X-Archives-Hash: 9a06d86120ae2086140592f1b5e16409
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de> wrote:
>
> I'm on KDE too, and it doesn't need it. =C2=A0Probably because my make.co=
nf
> explicitly says "-fortran" in it.
>
That's actually the correct statement. When I removed the fortran flag
it didn't change anything because (I suppose) the KDE profile has
included it as a default.
- Mark