From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-115228-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1P1GrS-0005Op-Uo
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 10:59:39 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B1D0CE063E;
	Thu, 30 Sep 2010 10:58:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F19BE063E
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 10:58:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45F161B4116
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 10:58:44 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 required=5.5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id wsm1+q6feQF8 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>;
	Thu, 30 Sep 2010 10:58:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wy0-f177.google.com (mail-wy0-f177.google.com [74.125.82.177])
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF8CE64CB8
	for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 10:58:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wyb38 with SMTP id 38so2041926wyb.36
        for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 03:58:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=L1hsYQcdCLU0TZwdCsQzeYYux/E8sLUlD/GQM52WFfQ=;
        b=U3jWhMGZUHv1QoYd53YQHtnZGDqv+6skjet7Dr4Gmfk5+k8hxcTKbbu7wLzJUvjmQA
         zaws5yHcRbmIIox+LF7iElFoDhAzfBQe8LbdXfajDSK9YgimT+mHNwlURkqLB5Zzfmec
         SezCPilo9HQ2suL6gkz7NDipci0+/89NK5tyw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        b=rXDDC82zN3g1UNeBwqz0IPmUYzGiqfksdgj7dp/UOq6HQSkij+ADk4LMMgeVvJ6YLB
         cMWi3PxrDAcFh2FkTYJ0BZV2xiyEdsL/lwWC74R04uHKYAYSuMZ866fnjAmEkhAkH15r
         6yHuzu2p5/9ABhvLPmoMS0dxV4YayYGzk8z3k=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.0.76 with SMTP id 54mr2794495wea.49.1285844316686; Thu, 30
 Sep 2010 03:58:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.26.68 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 03:58:36 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:58:36 +0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTintU9mSre7WP1oYZVyqeucLGehRotrLOv1AsOxR@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-user] firefox-bin optimizations?
From: Mark David Dumlao <madumlao@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 52ad88d1-29de-4ea1-8839-8ea50a4cd9ba
X-Archives-Hash: 8e714761631831d840ec6747bfa336dd

Heya,
I noticed that my firefox-bin is a lot smaller in memory footprint
compared to ordinary gentoo-compiled firefox.

Does anyone know what compiler flags upstream applies to their
firefox? I turned off the custom-optimization USE on mine assuming
that it would follow upstream optimizations, but maybe it doesn't.

--=20
This email is:=A0 =A0 [ ] actionable=A0=A0 [ ] fyi=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 [ ] socia=
l
Response needed:=A0 [ ] yes=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 [ ] up to you=A0 [ ] no
Time-sensitive:=A0=A0 [ ] immediate=A0 =A0 [ ] soon=A0 =A0 =A0=A0 [ ] none