From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-119025-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1PfLaG-0006RC-A5
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 00:07:33 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 79A14E04D2
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 00:07:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE8A5E0837
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:56:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so225959wwi.10
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:56:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=xXE+F/i429Hc8AwAEFQFtZJ8cgNeLU7Rr3NZgk3wJ7A=;
        b=kA2JI4VwPtOkm3V04h08k6502lhW9Xfff2JEXW5cUUhuhK31iUfsWH2Eki9Ffw5FvA
         yP+AfJmuUXOe5q5ZVOTrY/ZCYuDlPSqLVLazwDCZHyQgaylb5fgzJAdr5NEHOMYs/pRz
         5NVIjYia9iQo2ZgBpB8kExI7CD+h7Dh7xOgCU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=fg1AnluiKm1aWGviZZWassISB0MZBY6jpZ+qRFF3RKGftB/IgN21fY+wpVznpvDYtJ
         KQ4K5AGgXLBiFZw+VrrETZyA4fhRbYjGGwOIie2pjiDwss7Iop5bs4Oo6xI8Xhga5TmT
         kTdPVKdkRP0djwGmX01W9u0WjUHI059LmNyvg=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.241.141 with SMTP id g13mr2534592wer.59.1295395006043;
 Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:56:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.16.21 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:56:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <201101182056.22212.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
References: <20110117172148.GD5748@solfire>
	<AANLkTik=6dqsQ6dgNDfGv49xrdt-Uw7iaNftc8fcyyPU@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimxc62wtS6YG0iWcdVDZOEt020d5x_+Pn9f_1sa@mail.gmail.com>
	<201101182056.22212.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:56:45 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTinLvFv=kPi_P2PuoxR0E_vVT7zE=vkWZfUKgEND@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Microcode update AMD
From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: a9eeb409230f17b356d8b23afe6440c5

On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com> wrote:
<SNIP>
>
> Is the /etc/microcode.dat path a bug, now that firmware is typically placed in
> /lib/firmware?
>
> Shall I create a symlink or raise a bug report?
> --
> Regards,
> Mick
>

Mick,
   I don't think so. Seems to me Gentoo can put this where ever it
wants as long as it matches the init script.

- Mark