From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1PBT6q-0005Nk-OU for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:05:41 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A722E0C2A; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:05:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yx0-f181.google.com (mail-yx0-f181.google.com [209.85.213.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B879E0C2A for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:05:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxn35 with SMTP id 35so16113yxn.40 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 07:05:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=be+h8YEwH4cUGksxeoAHU4dMyyl+LUkRlxsmet6S150=; b=ToLclfhKYJGZrVaOY7b/kArpmSFyrwTug743xLkXEwkFWbcD+ozEmkjuJc56z8tls4 rp9Dv2qhrgOh+AuM3q9x2DuqIV2DDGQyMFXhf+X5setjC0kOMPZvDYR41jETycrCBrBt 6d2mYn7Ltgbh8gCD+MsMUV1VMNQWVoqGHJc5w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=tdkvlu0UPomWXHLwLVXWkxzkgegvAZCKQmYUN2kLGST8r838igGgVdP/QBfNumawTy rCzhjsr5K1g/x9vs2mdic2nECsWO3RXwoMkCOQw0PeQzykwXotfRYiWUbFzhSv9T6j6Z pUKq2oFE68WWKoSweOV0I0ecdhHcJD/AcMNT4= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.171.196 with SMTP id k4mr1243048icz.178.1288274709830; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 07:05:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.175.136 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 07:05:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101028125822.GY17225@syscon4.inet> References: <20101028125822.GY17225@syscon4.inet> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:05:09 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] perl 5.12 downgrade ?? From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 83c35fb1-4dc6-449e-83ce-5cda0a5aa5e7 X-Archives-Hash: 234fb33c3d556d51d5298ece3d9edbaf On 28 October 2010 13:58, Joseph wrote: > After upgrading to Perl 5.12 and all cleanup "perl-cleaner --all" > When I run "emerge --depclean" it asked me to removed the following packages > listed below. > However, when I check all of them are needed by some other packages. Do I > need them? (I retained them all) > > virtual/perl-Package-Constants > virtual/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib > virtual/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2 > dev-java/antlr perl-core/MIME-Base64 > perl-core/Test-Simple > perl-core/Archive-Tar > perl-core/Test-Harness > perl-core/IO-Compress > perl-core/IO-Zlib > perl-core/Digest-MD5 > perl-core/CGI > perl-core/Digest-SHA perl-core/Compress-Raw-Bzip2 perl-core/Sys-Syslog > perl-core/digest-base perl-core/Compress-Raw-Zlib > perl-core/version > perl-core/DB_File > perl-core/Package-Constants > dev-java/gjdoc > perl-core/libnet > > The reason I'm asking is that I'm getting some strange errors when using > 'sql-ledger' eg. > Using a hash as a reference is deprecated at SL/IS.pm line 582. > > I think it might be related to recent perl upgrade. > Is it possible / safe to downgrade to previous "perl-5.8.8-r8" ? > or do I just delete the above perl module. I am getting the same here. I retained everything until things settle a bit and newer versions get unmasked. -- Regards, Mick