From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1P221m-0001aQ-PR for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 13:21:27 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 72C0BE0849; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 13:20:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A771E084D for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 13:20:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf28 with SMTP id 28so5324301wyf.40 for ; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 06:20:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/qoWHb7anmhTiKwHBEgzDxIeyfRhMSwTH3FbZmexpNo=; b=VK4jRtEUKMqRWhfePxqI3wv9M2eg7LDZqlG09SpHLCILayQyqJ7KVOn0jWrYPAPMED X3MpUGyhJExXKG/TbTNdqlCKg/guiRufIet2WsyN6rcAybZi6G3IfIOU3WpnvT3MTEwT aQA9v4010eS7ROWloq+ffd+pYFkBjSZ9lOogY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=eHo6X0jCNhZUgaxN3+WzIa1XbuaWEPiBWziAl59l2Qdy6eMKnXZFGGlNBLVy5x7s1D N3198LgySreaGdtXvk32wOJtQl69EY3yYJFWcLytQaEpNlD2RoJanjDpiQaWqLFjUrII 2F1EtXoV6HE9IKh8sghvDJnMWJx9vzODAHuWk= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.89.146 with SMTP id c18mr3217330wef.33.1286025636539; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 06:20:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.3.138 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 06:20:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1286022959.6591.620.camel@yamato.local> References: <1285800006.6591.313.camel@yamato.local> <1286020299.8777.0.camel@rattus> <1286022959.6591.620.camel@yamato.local> Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 06:20:36 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Notice: possible past, present and future breakage related to .la files From: Mark Knecht To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: bfd7660d-cf96-4fa9-a993-fe9eb4414fcb X-Archives-Hash: e78c3faec6021cb604e3c8715768e856 On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 5:35 AM, Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 wrote: > Il giorno sab, 02/10/2010 alle 19.51 +0800, William Kenworthy ha > scritto: >> What are the implications of adding this "snippet" - will it come back >> to bite us (users) when the next version of portage comes along? >> > No, it'll waste a bit of time if it's not removed because the same logic > is running twice (once from lafilefixer, once from Portage), but they > won't conflict one wit the other, that I can assure you of. >> >> - none of my systems have a /etc/portage/bashrc so Ive created them, >> but >> should they be executable, have a hash-bang line, ... ? > > No need for anything, they are sourced so they can be non-executable and > they don't need hash-bangs. > >> - will this snippet fix the problems with "equery check" marking >> libraries as broken after lafilefixer is run? (I presume an emerge -e >> world will be needed to update the database ...) > > The new installed packages with the above post_src_unpack won't cause > any vdb-related issues because the files are fixed _before_ the merge to > live filesystem and thus the modified file's md5 and mtime will be saved > in it. > > -- > Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 =E2=80=94 =E2=80=9CFlameeyes=E2=80=9D > http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ > > If you found a .asc file in this mail and know not what it is, > it's a GnuPG digital signature: http://www.gnupg.org/ > > Diego, Thanks for the answers and thanks especially for all the work you've done over the years. Cheers, Mark