From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1P1nlc-0001cC-CK for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 22:07:48 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3110FE0B88; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 22:06:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-iw0-f181.google.com (mail-iw0-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 179BFE0B88 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 22:06:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so5899489iwn.40 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 15:06:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=T4yt+iYHfnYKgxQohngKPKlT+WyXWHiAE9uGkMtt96g=; b=TjRX+fQTN+q5hL9tErncI2vs8cwrTI3uEAS2OA7R2bRoxAoH4safS3pksE44Z9zkmS xwu6DDwGpPRVuXGlwfGvvvLKqxL6j8ULMkH3SAeqY6f5LJ+mxQR0RsqMKmPZZuk9AYvO BErr64Rcc7yf94gqwrBnQcM0zUgXHVH9/Sj60= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=RvFxlC5GEqvPfadaQfCrciJCluNwB7/jGyYQP96WBNfke1qhwY2wHskeSirG08xbnX MYNLGRjYkMBcO7QHMI3Z3JkNjPI+V/LLysVv/xCKfEDM1U4jSGJ20N+Hp3kEpYadkgAd tzM37jS7lDLgQ0y8G1LiNHEF+Af/WPerE6dVc= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.2.81 with SMTP id 17mr7664100icj.40.1285970811655; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 15:06:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.44.134 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 15:06:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4CA60C7A.20301@gmail.com> <4CA63376.3040100@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 00:06:51 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: oder of files opened by a process From: Al To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: e8a0ebd2-edbd-45ed-b2eb-3624abc467b8 X-Archives-Hash: a5099fb54861e01e9198bd6a2f4c8831 > Hey, that's cool man...I'm certainly not telling you not to post here, > I just think it would have been a good idea to post details of your > esoteric setup in the original post. As you've found, the cygwin and You are right in that to enough degree. In this case it would have been of advantage. > gnu/linux environment(s) are not exactly compatible, and a solution in > one may not work in the other. I'm not even saying it's the way it > should be, but rather that it's the de facto way it is: A very large > majority of people on this list run whitebread 'Gentoo Linux' and as > such, without further clarification in your post, that's what they >From my experience it is also a reason to strip down my questions to something as simple as possible. Then I get useful answers. The strace program, Dale suggests, is a good answer for me. I am not only using Vista after all. I still can boot Gentoo/Linux to find the answer by that program. If I explain the esoteric context, to ask a simple newby question thereafter, people often give crazy comments and you go without an answer. Everything out of their horizon is evil for some stubborns. That is also a real live experience. It is tiresome, if that happens to often. I guess you knows this, you ask: How to do this and that ... people start a political discussion ... why do you want to do this and that? Time is lost, no answer yet. That is often simply counter productive. Hence, I became a little conservative with explaining esotric contexts. But, in this case it was the other way round. I got the comments, because I didn't explain the context. There isn't a perfect world. :-) > think you are running as well....so I don't know, you may have better > results on the specialized gentoo-alt list, but if you want to post > here go ahead...just give us some details :) Have a nice WE Al