From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Obva2-0000Xy-4N for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:12:54 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE744E0B4D for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:12:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D946E0797 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:37:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm19 with SMTP id 19so5517179fxm.40 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 05:37:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=i9k7PAV3Mxg8yOnbT1GexmjNjeVDxEy6J6Fy+K91ZqE=; b=Fmb8arAriyRncaqExHSQuCx328pPhrPDi+E1dDYzvlPlGhJa7umcT8QJ6BhUOApk21 1TEdtSKfI++lpdt8TjNKTWAl00T+RvMkuzEpYPWTkClwupJt2OVduMwf+eFAzqf2vt4c hIPS/xkWRyX6fqk4TaLjpY/OdRsYm9wC6CS1g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=hVnRJvCpN0uHdwfcTbZFUIsXJhyMv2Q1qS4Q81vUkqcewdz0yuDzKPsp7QYZp3MpiA V65brl91KX55ZB06hkTRFVwZfDvQtl2Mz0hpykq00xqJqyY//TybiI8Drce0d52zMFJK iv0qD+UgWi6MMA9EsFODw4UJ0fbjlp21hmTnA= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.218.4 with SMTP id v4mr508963muq.98.1279802224342; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 05:37:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.68.9 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 05:37:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87oce0awro.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk> References: <4C474FD3.5060906@gmail.com> <87oce0awro.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk> Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:37:04 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] SPF & sendmail: howto? From: "Mr. Jarry" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636416a55f6f7a8048bf92cba X-Archives-Salt: ab601019-8095-423e-8c4f-3b79500b99bd X-Archives-Hash: 9cd4242d0f9fa7f691a6a52ecf41faa0 --001636416a55f6f7a8048bf92cba Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > I assume you have a perfectly legitimate reason for still using sendmail in > this day and age? For ~10 years I've been a satisfied sendmail-user. Does it count for a legitimate reason? On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Jason Carson wrote: > To enable SPF on outgoing mail all you have to do is create a SPF record > and put it in your /var/bind/domain.tld.hosts file, assuming your using > Bind. I have it. But that is for other MTA's receiving mails from my one. I want to use SPF for incomming mails too... > I use Postfix and recommend you switch. If you want to filter incoming > mail with SPF then you have to configure some stuff in the > /etc/postfix/main.cf and /etc/postfix/master.cf files. Google it for the > way to do it. Thanks, but I'd prefer to stick with sendmail till the end of its days. Or at least till the first usable sendmailX/MeTA1, whatever comes first... On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Graham Murray wrote: > There are a number of SPF milters that can be used, but (AFAIK) none of > them are in the portage tree. The one I use is sm-spf > (http://smfs.sourceforge.net/smf-spf.html). > > Finally someone who does not suggest me to switch to other MTA! btw, It is strange, there is a milter for SenderID (which iirc is in some way close to Microsoft) in portage tree, but nothing for openSPF. I will try to make an ebuild. Maybe there are still more "real unix admins" using old'n'good sendmail. But no flame over "which MTA is better", please. (anyway, we all know Sendmail is the best! :-) Jarry --001636416a55f6f7a8048bf92cba Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> wrote:
> I assume you have a perfectly legitimate = reason for still using=20 sendmail in
> this day and age?

For ~10 years I've been a satisfied sendm= ail-user. Does it count for a legitimate reason?


On Thu, Jul 22,= 2010 at 1:06 AM, Jason=20 Carson <jason@= jasoncarson.ca> wrote:
> To enable SPF on outgoing=20 mail all you have to do is create a SPF record
> and put it in your /var/bind/domain.tld.hosts file, assuming your usin= g
> Bind.

I have it. But that is for other MTA's receiving mail= s from my one.
I want to use SPF for incomming mails too...

> I use Postfix and recommend you switch. If you want to filter incoming=
> mail with SPF then you have to configure some stuff in the
> /etc/postfix/main.cf= and=20 /etc/postfix/master.cf= =20 files. Google it for the
> way to do it.

Thanks, but I'd prefer to stick with sendmail till the end of its d= ays.
Or at least till the first usable sendmailX/MeTA1, whatever comes f= irst...


On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Graham = Murray <graha= m@gmurray.org.uk> wrote:
There are a number of SPF milters that can be used, but (AFAIK) none of
them are in the portage tree. The one I use is sm-spf
(htt= p://smfs.sourceforge.net/smf-spf.html).


Finally someone who does not suggest me to switch to= other MTA!
btw, It is strange, there is a milter for SenderID (which ii= rc is in some way
close to Microsoft) in portage tree, but nothing for o= penSPF. I will try to
make an ebuild. Maybe there are still more "real unix admins" usi= ng
old'n'good sendmail. But no flame over "which MTA is bet= ter", please.
(anyway, we all know Sendmail is the best! :-)

Jarry
--001636416a55f6f7a8048bf92cba--