From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1P6IPL-0000Bu-3Z for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 07:39:23 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F2221E0653; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 07:39:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gy0-f181.google.com (mail-gy0-f181.google.com [209.85.160.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2B38E0653 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 07:39:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyg8 with SMTP id 8so3627224gyg.40 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 00:39:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=tw5QqLxls9fAVxbEaZM8cCuE/hKgmJebqxtWMA2ZYbE=; b=cm2cOBG1fNQlNoBz1XODQQFRJ97Wc4Z8d7HwpqElXZKivONtJjdB+6CpXrT8CyusLc H8B+oqk8X4eOmhay0kU4PXhZf/fYuE1JWo4EeqPH9JywU5u/qJEs01akp+9gCEv9K3sq bAZ/rNKYeJ+ZyEzWJmjqN+I24/W+SOyIU0lug= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=cMsjzD6hPksQ/6vSXy0EY6/shbbFFzYW9g+E7q5vLVitDFxd6QPpLxO4DEfSI3MGEQ WV2zuRPz2KNnxYT2q1HtI9yDTOInl8xMfGpfwPs9DqV72/xoiWfH327voxGcJuEvnGt6 Y6CLylZLtdp0HfNbe4I0Jv9GERDFX7w3OB21o= Received: by 10.150.182.11 with SMTP id e11mr2856377ybf.210.1287041941468; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 00:39:01 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.148.11 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 00:38:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Dean Matzkov Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 01:38:41 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --unmerge fails To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: a761650b-a9d2-41dd-89e7-6eec22520f0a X-Archives-Hash: 36e48cf11ea7a403bf89db911d120ff4 Well, if you were running portage-2-2_rc67, that's already pretty much bleeding edge =P But just out of curiosity, though, is there any particular reason you're not running a more-stable version of Portage, such as v2.1.8.3 or v2.1.9.17? The 2.2 release-candidates are hard-masked for a reason - which includes things randomly breaking, such as this unmerge issue you experienced. On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Hilco Wijbenga wrote: > I didn't really want to be running cutting edge portage but it did > solve my problem. I can unmerge again. :-)