From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1P8WX2-0008M1-3f for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:08:32 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A4CBE0878 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:08:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gx0-f181.google.com (mail-gx0-f181.google.com [209.85.161.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8E9E0738 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:10:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk24 with SMTP id 24so3203425gxk.40 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 03:10:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=898ZXCnO4OVVs2E2t4knb5p4SyELwM+6fHCh6ktBTsU=; b=aRs29/kZht6df3W39LYWPnaSIKHkLfcEQsW8q6BIqw9Ev8y4cPUhP0lUNdwCxFBxfM qhl2oe4lzmVZVzXYR1OUDMOYLwLt45DYAuXOG3ed0+umTOdIU/QkoNzGaFRH8VpbO85u eG8qUFskBRPopB4Zq3khWRnAB0DDNLpyLhriQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=jjbfCGYeOQGAiDOv60wIjl89KBFftmGgs+ciJIerY5VIFwjys/6LCfaRIehXvgNb2v Ypd1V34h/Qj1V/5GuKTVB/kx8hSafIOFTSNYugOlva01QktrTiqqJdkaLSDVNsgL2gln Hin6ak8KDWErXK5g6c5VTvfj+05ejmkcnz8Ho= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.50.3 with SMTP id x3mr1029061ybx.29.1287569442337; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 03:10:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.220.2 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 03:10:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101019210744.1e9947ed@digimed.co.uk> References: <4CBDD956.3090804@gmail.com> <20101019180221.GB2287@Caemlyn.diku.dk> <4CBDEA0E.5030004@gmail.com> <20101019210744.1e9947ed@digimed.co.uk> Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 18:10:42 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc upgrade: Active gcc profile is invalid! From: =?UTF-8?B?5p2O5YGl?= To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd6ae1e3bf5720493099f16 X-Archives-Salt: 95391d4a-634c-4302-825c-33ce2b1b07a3 X-Archives-Hash: 164c490ce5a759ae86c257d71c1f1928 --000e0cd6ae1e3bf5720493099f16 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +1 2010/10/20 Neil Bothwick > On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 20:57:18 +0200, Jarry wrote: > > > I just think it is somehow time-consuming, emerging gcc two times. > > Especially when I have to repeat it with my 12 gentoo servers. > > Sequentially, unfortunatally, as they share the same hardware... > > Why not use --buildpkg the first time and --usepkg the other 11 times? > > > -- > Neil Bothwick > > deja vous - the act of forgetting someone's name /again/ despite being > introduced to them several times. > -- Jian Li --000e0cd6ae1e3bf5720493099f16 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1

2010/10/20 Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk>
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 20:57:18 +0200, Jarry wrote:

> I just think it is somehow time-consuming, emerging gcc two times.
> Especially when I have to repeat it with my 12 gentoo servers.
> Sequentially, unfortunatally, as they share the same hardware...

Why not use --buildpkg the first time and --usepkg the other 11 times= ?


--
Neil Bothwick

deja vous - the act of forgetting someone's name /again/ despite being<= br> introduced to them several times.



--
Jian Li

--000e0cd6ae1e3bf5720493099f16--