From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OUsHJ-00088v-Rz for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 02:16:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 59D8FE09B3; Sat, 3 Jul 2010 02:15:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-iw0-f181.google.com (mail-iw0-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D599E09B3 for ; Sat, 3 Jul 2010 02:15:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn42 with SMTP id 42so605137iwn.40 for ; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 19:15:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NmAO0WAszeSILfYVYai0fqY6aSMHgrSIm9ZNGFvHe6g=; b=qjYeZRL2Jp4XMXDkzU7zOfqRikoAhdirRVwMx1l2WUaIeIYHtB/4fV9rhL4giOp6ti teaKJE9jiy7bOluTPoQxPClF5Tac8fux1gHtrpdAqlUXeIDW2lCIQXLM30pJ5Qy1SkBF z8IlGDaDYN4ZN0xQAn3Q7Ltch6X/hn0ojBb8s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=m+HpE9uk736MVLpi1T1nw/4QIKba39csZhRwdVU8ikq1ALz2t6LpbcdWxSpijZBrTB rZ1oL33UgDjtBAU/hDGzHQKqwrTdmGAx0jRVUOHXkyf3BCbhvIxO59SWK84HUryxgXF0 YXR0/n4UWOtxpyF0Lmp/jffEWp3HLsFvggS68= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.2.77 with SMTP id 13mr546138icj.28.1278123349000; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 19:15:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.4.79 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 19:15:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C2BDD7C.2010406@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 19:15:48 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Patch via perl script in an ebuild? From: Grant To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: b25cb9ed-6fcc-4a0a-bb5e-babe6fe42341 X-Archives-Hash: 902bd7b55746bf8b0feb7ac9fa2e2982 >>> David, you mentioned in the bug that you couldn't get the patch to >>> work clean. =A0I thought you got it working before when you posted the >>> patched Typemap for me to download. =A0Did it work then but not now? >>> >>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D305621 >> >> Ah, I didn't know you had this already mostly figured out in a bug. >> Full disclosure requested -- from the very beginning! :D >> >> After taking a quick peek: do those ebuilds succeed in installing >> something? Since they don't follow CPAN conventions (esp. wrt naming) >> I'm not sure what perl-module.eclass actually does for their >> src_compile, src_install and other steps. Also, the "->" used in SRC >> might have interesting side-effects to paths, as the tarball name no >> longer matches its content directory's name. >> >> -- >> Arttu V. -- Running Gentoo is like running with scissors >> >> > I don't think I will use the software, I was just helping to put the > pieces together, Grant has been testing it as we move forward. Once we > get the pieces together and if it will work as intended I think we > could contact upstream to help with a more sensible approach to > packaging the patch for the stock SOAP-WSDL, so updating will be > easier to maintain. > Just my 2c :) > > > -- > David Abbott (dabbott) You think Google will change the way it packages the SOAP-WSDL patch if we request it? - Grant