From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-112406-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1OUsHJ-00088v-Rz
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 02:16:26 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 59D8FE09B3;
Sat, 3 Jul 2010 02:15:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-iw0-f181.google.com (mail-iw0-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D599E09B3
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 3 Jul 2010 02:15:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by iwn42 with SMTP id 42so605137iwn.40
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 19:15:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=NmAO0WAszeSILfYVYai0fqY6aSMHgrSIm9ZNGFvHe6g=;
b=qjYeZRL2Jp4XMXDkzU7zOfqRikoAhdirRVwMx1l2WUaIeIYHtB/4fV9rhL4giOp6ti
teaKJE9jiy7bOluTPoQxPClF5Tac8fux1gHtrpdAqlUXeIDW2lCIQXLM30pJ5Qy1SkBF
z8IlGDaDYN4ZN0xQAn3Q7Ltch6X/hn0ojBb8s=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=m+HpE9uk736MVLpi1T1nw/4QIKba39csZhRwdVU8ikq1ALz2t6LpbcdWxSpijZBrTB
rZ1oL33UgDjtBAU/hDGzHQKqwrTdmGAx0jRVUOHXkyf3BCbhvIxO59SWK84HUryxgXF0
YXR0/n4UWOtxpyF0Lmp/jffEWp3HLsFvggS68=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.2.77 with SMTP id 13mr546138icj.28.1278123349000; Fri, 02
Jul 2010 19:15:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.4.79 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 19:15:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTildP5IAP1lfWhpXHws4Dym5LES2osim_JTopL8L@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikfNp7r1tG-DQVKoyk8nb1M_F4B5CODwkixhVvg@mail.gmail.com>
<AANLkTikJTHKiuJk6Q3uAqFhdkfIAgZCZvvZi96V888dA@mail.gmail.com>
<4C2BDD7C.2010406@gmail.com>
<AANLkTimGViOcZaeYoQ9_mPE9P0kkU7Git2GSw1Gr71q6@mail.gmail.com>
<AANLkTilAXpQFbAXsl_cgvSC_Br73nuvBiswpCI1hiFph@mail.gmail.com>
<AANLkTinjS9vI8BTL29PM_Iz1TCL3LRXS3-ANUHQvgRtn@mail.gmail.com>
<AANLkTilVte1HMo_uAumATALV_hS834rY94E4H74CdNgf@mail.gmail.com>
<AANLkTinc1sIOOz0ap8_kqOi1mQyIfuOUyGR-tJgyzBfu@mail.gmail.com>
<AANLkTildP5IAP1lfWhpXHws4Dym5LES2osim_JTopL8L@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 19:15:48 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTimz01Hcups6MwpUc9fIQ3EOrBFc2LIODnjiKTIM@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Patch via perl script in an ebuild?
From: Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: b25cb9ed-6fcc-4a0a-bb5e-babe6fe42341
X-Archives-Hash: 902bd7b55746bf8b0feb7ac9fa2e2982
>>> David, you mentioned in the bug that you couldn't get the patch to
>>> work clean. =A0I thought you got it working before when you posted the
>>> patched Typemap for me to download. =A0Did it work then but not now?
>>>
>>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D305621
>>
>> Ah, I didn't know you had this already mostly figured out in a bug.
>> Full disclosure requested -- from the very beginning! :D
>>
>> After taking a quick peek: do those ebuilds succeed in installing
>> something? Since they don't follow CPAN conventions (esp. wrt naming)
>> I'm not sure what perl-module.eclass actually does for their
>> src_compile, src_install and other steps. Also, the "->" used in SRC
>> might have interesting side-effects to paths, as the tarball name no
>> longer matches its content directory's name.
>>
>> --
>> Arttu V. -- Running Gentoo is like running with scissors
>>
>>
> I don't think I will use the software, I was just helping to put the
> pieces together, Grant has been testing it as we move forward. Once we
> get the pieces together and if it will work as intended I think we
> could contact upstream to help with a more sensible approach to
> packaging the patch for the stock SOAP-WSDL, so updating will be
> easier to maintain.
> Just my 2c :)
>
>
> --
> David Abbott (dabbott)
You think Google will change the way it packages the SOAP-WSDL patch
if we request it?
- Grant