From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q3nB7-000525-7C for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:26:37 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B993BE0671; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:25:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qy0-f181.google.com (mail-qy0-f181.google.com [209.85.216.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8254EE0671 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:25:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyg14 with SMTP id 14so1594086qyg.19 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 03:25:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=zDDZizgg3XBaQ/XNeWxYRVL7kqRKdY4Waim1oxpPIlw=; b=oq1h19nmzNOqZgF/xiWSaRSFEL9snYfmgAc4q2ubou95DVh9WXU8HZ+bhqmADarSt0 vzg2tQe8meMUyNj6Re/tNdDFuVtq7tBh+SiHf6skv5eTYVqzzyJTwyxWqMUcJ9PyMtSY 1dNYp/T5sMWhktIYqxDzuKLNIe2CBXW0WilEo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=HIZiP1ah1ms+59BEMdizu3pmW67OQDnuWWv//EAK4VFYiUjDF5JTCZ3vxLkOLd3t7T WM6wtB5NJTm2oVdWR4fpJ+mR1OVMWIlmos9Njg2srQAtSE87Vq1n+PkX/h24Sr0ndgIX f2jVpEa/ZKU0cK2bk/phBCTSw/Zfmdxtgdh8w= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.45.1 with SMTP id c1mr2276034qcf.259.1301221513906; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 03:25:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.19.138 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 03:25:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201103271110.19731.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> References: <4D8EDB7E.6090801@gmail.com> <4D8EEA3B.4010904@gmail.com> <201103271110.19731.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 21:25:13 +1100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: python-2.7 update: re-emerge of cracklib failed, how can I fix it? From: Adam Carter To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363ba0721c4a95049f743e99 X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 7538c8f7113af629b70b3b35d329cdd8 --0016363ba0721c4a95049f743e99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > ... and run 4. and 5. above in the wrong order? > > In the e-warning words of --depclean itself: > > "* Depclean may break link level dependencies. Thus, it is > * recommended to use a tool such as `revdep-rebuild` ... " > Agreed, revdep last. I always run depclean with pretend first. If depclean wants to remove key packages like python, i will often just remove all the others it has identified manually rather than running it again without pretend. I also use buildsyspkg. --0016363ba0721c4a95049f743e99 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
... and run 4. a= nd 5. above in the wrong order?

In the e-warning words of --depclean itself:

"* Depclean may break link level dependencies. Thus, it is
=A0* recommended to use a tool such as `revdep-rebuild` ... "

Agreed, revdep last. I always run depclean with pretend f= irst. If depclean wants to remove key packages like python, i will often ju= st remove all the others it has identified manually rather than running it = again without pretend. I also use buildsyspkg.
--0016363ba0721c4a95049f743e99--