From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1P6D0K-0004r5-No for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 01:53:12 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 96869E066B; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 01:52:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f53.google.com (mail-ew0-f53.google.com [209.85.215.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE1EE066B for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 01:52:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy8 with SMTP id 8so1433624ewy.40 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:52:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=8j6lfKWIg7jmvExI7PPJSMpGBq+J3E/ceuLCk0ABgXg=; b=lSz/1zQBWPZFh2FlNh1ruZI60b+C4DBBNVXKp+u+BQ6eqxsRxPXE+HxCHboRIcn8WL JmnspoWyZaYxSsvlWQe/5s+XE+8K3NkeCPtoMvnqQIQTvS6DK56eTCHr4VA51fIGG7ao vfuYf0hIWjD7CmPfbhjzUzlaxzLLOx+p1KgMM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=nwkS6GTAKmEwpR4A6H5KxFvQY0pP21EAPBQVD/weV+JKORFXpWyv3e5DTzOm7NXgan 8Ule2mO4l6RlHpXbAOOcr9hkBA/7+FIXQEoG72/H7pVdSnYXRfgY2seulupiLkq4EpS3 xJbB0U/yGXdYcLZzQkl9Vt6TDTUfTm2He9+Z4= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.19.78 with SMTP id z14mr516302eba.66.1287021134672; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:52:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.45.72 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:52:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:52:14 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --unmerge fails From: Hilco Wijbenga To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 2bff49bc-c013-4286-abd0-e370e370d9eb X-Archives-Hash: b19bb621170e55ce9a1cc6cff5ef0c86 On 13 October 2010 15:29, Dean Matzkov wrote: > Have you tried upgrading to the latest version of Portage 2.2? The > newest version in the tree is currently portage-2.2_rc95, while you're > still using portage-2.2_rc67. Perhaps there's a bug causing this that > was fixed in subsequent release? I didn't really want to be running cutting edge portage but it did solve my problem. I can unmerge again. :-)