From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-112244-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1OTuMa-0006pz-3G
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:17:52 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 353D3E09C2;
Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:17:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B92E09C2
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:17:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wyf28 with SMTP id 28so151465wyf.40
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 03:17:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=dY0DM9by2IUVE4NIyk+T3bawi3wwq1eSH5MIdMbQ93M=;
b=p3bhdqZ69ZuFFVce6FtIBHTJuKXl+oigr/LAY1PNwP0TxubKbHFTgaoj1oHPjjGfxE
HleAQhEyGH3jLt21ea8m8Psoi5b/yh9MPcbzEjfcOvVOV+2OE115J8iYROtGRbILSfBL
DqzvcI4dIisy9T6xLcUnuWwJAoOyldhnCE7Sg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
b=NqLvXIUxgHVZt0TqM9C/3K2CbB1+QL3+MAvea2+rsnmGjhkKCdUVm5+TH/Jgv2f1gS
mJhSjJdQQltIpFEr3o18MFCTEEDGlsbmmJQdAiglCbJVX3Liy+EKoZBPrWQRlXRz4MZX
dcnAZV966gtyXhNWFfs/cDSinITOFxIZnYNZ8=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.160.145 with SMTP id u17mr11113515wek.18.1277893034030;
Wed, 30 Jun 2010 03:17:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.162.71 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 03:17:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201006301030.38069.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org>
References: <1277766970.4c292d3a54f96@oo.vpn.blueboxsoft.pl>
<201006300121.18419.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
<201006300723.16548.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
<201006301030.38069.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:17:13 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTimco5GRQcuVmoIyjr2jvHLRGPC82hBd_xQs7qlu@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] KDE? Get me out of here!
From: Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: dc93c666-531f-4211-91b2-be55afd49432
X-Archives-Hash: 9d822e46de218f612a04457c385be124
On 30 June 2010 10:30, Peter Humphrey <peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 June 2010 07:23:06 Mick wrote:
>
>> So I assume that Kontact (and or Kmail) starts nepomuke when launched
>
> Kmail-4.4.4 does start nepomuk here, which occasionally fails with some
> problem with mysql errors. Restarting kmail has always fixed it so far.
Yes it does, just looked into it a bit more. Starting Kmail as a
stand alone app (instead of starting up the whole KDE desktop)
launches/usr/bin/akonadi_control, which runs akonadiserver, which
calls /usr/bin/akonadi_nepomuk_contact_feeder and this calls
/usr/bin/nepomukserver (or something in that order).
Unfortunately with KDE-4.4 akonadi takes longer to start. We're only
talking half a second or so of the akonadi progress bar showing up
just before Kmail launches. Relaunching Kmail thereafter incurs no
delays.
I'll be updating KDE on my old PIII laptop soon and would be
interested to see how long it takes on that Vs KDE-4.3.
--
Regards,
Mick