From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2Nly-000144-3b for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:06:50 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5053B1C061; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:04:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qy0-f174.google.com (mail-qy0-f174.google.com [209.85.216.174]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 186011C04F for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:04:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so4440530qyk.19 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 06:04:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=YGaXCKxy+5vMcROw4oeSZTLaqINPIkwBqTmGE31UbZQ=; b=v4NUADSI4tir4j7VmWCcYR5Ay9W35YWGBKOtznOG4fljuNsQreHPCrmChRIC0wl2qb rT89bgL/34mMQH/XZXujWO1LO0xkK687t4JkNoG71+In6uTzRxDnilXv9ns+gK6SOLpz HUoFP1xsls4fF9Vwg7yxza+qCATmroVmM75gE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=qjmTCmDROvOZlpZpu0niAooa0WAAySoqwYGapuQ01u9S1V9kMdrKizFosEgaRr/puN 1yy4LI1TC7tXYsj5LoGxUeshIWfKXkGgE6A4ShgZlFth5d+M0LTak2doh7nH9mqrgwbR 4Kh+Jd1Gm9m6Yh1Tpug+I3S++EmpID2ho5Buc= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.180.68 with SMTP id bt4mr628457qab.110.1300885463486; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 06:04:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.142.15 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 06:04:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4d89b8ba.9505df0a.1617.6e4b@mx.google.com> References: <4D87A7C6.1060502@gmail.com> <4D89A0F9.8080007@gmail.com> <201103230850.15123.stephane@22decembre.eu> <4d89b8ba.9505df0a.1617.6e4b@mx.google.com> Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:04:23 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] the best filesystem for server: XFS or JFS (or?) From: "Mr. Jarry" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 8da2a8ec010e0bca8e3d490f4146b775 On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > And if you don't care about barriers, jfs might be a good choice. Knowing nothing about "barriers" I tried to find some info and came accross this article: http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/tip/Deciding-when-to-use-Linux-file-system-barriers It says, barriers can not work with device mapper (raid, lvm). If it is true (?) then because of having all partitions in raid1 (md), I need not worry about barriers. Whatever filesystem I picked out, I could not use barriers... Jarry