From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ptkok-0001gE-OL for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 17:54:03 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 55AAF1C033; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 17:52:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f53.google.com (mail-ew0-f53.google.com [209.85.215.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B971C033 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 17:52:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy7 with SMTP id 7so1475406ewy.40 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 09:52:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=fCWQM2g1b5t+KYSltvmi173JTnrWphDwoCzKpEvxGOI=; b=h5mSL8upuL0cezbsZF1l6E0SbFqe0XWDx3nZlap+SFur1BufkxjO3sQ0kMNSwhWODL t4nNheqQCRwZ8ThIIILPyGdCt65/hB83i6uBv3BfcGUbq6kxdMHpRA4QljCiaebiggUM uPa+pVnGdt9D+eAzWtgMNCxxKdT5OxV98qGLo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=EUlM6h7Mg04q6jyAeQyF2C+5p6d9mUmCuxtdICVS2WL3YhWpxWOEXCFMEOfKl5Gb27 8PLc2WEm8g/fNTokxODW7jiOhoCH2fX+MZq+DEncL1xQiRxxUiGR2xpywGInRIObTT5A 451pbIBmkkw0cbZTq48/br8sVy4Ah1XH926SI= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.119.72 with SMTP id m48mr3277871eeh.30.1298829160108; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 09:52:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.126.210 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 09:52:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.126.210 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 09:52:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D69205B.5030700@gmail.com> References: <1298652987.23841.0@numa-i> <4D6835F8.3070406@gmail.com> <201102262103.37456.yohan.pereira@gmail.com> <4D69205B.5030700@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 12:52:40 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Random reboots. Where to start? From: Jason Weisberger To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba5bb989b65ad5049d473a2e X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 01d914bf3fa3a4352120317d2f9006a5 --90e6ba5bb989b65ad5049d473a2e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I actually have 4 gigs of gskill DDR 3 1600 and from experience I can tell you that the stock voltage on those chips is set too low. The company actually recommends that you use 1.9 volts while most motherboards will default to 1.5 or 1.6. Double check this however, because I know they were working on some JEDEC compliant DDR 3 (standard voltage of 1.5) a while back but I'm not certain if they just decided to throw in the towel on that effort. My system would crash using 1.5 but wouldn't produce any errors on memtest86+. This all just sounds too familiar. On Feb 26, 2011 11:15 AM, "Dale" wrote: > Yohan Pereira wrote: >> >> On Saturday 26 Feb 2011 04:36:32 AM Dale wrote: >> >> >I booted a USB stick and it ran a long time with no problem. >> >> >> ok this may have nothing to do with it but was it a 32 bit OS on the >> usb stick? does it use all 8 gigs? >> >> >> dont know if this makes any diffrence though just guessing. >> >> >> -- >> >> >> - Yohan Pereira >> >> >> "A man can do as he will, but not will as he will" - Schopenhauer >> > > > I booted a 64 bit. It did see all the ram and I'm up to 16Gbs now. I > started with 4, then went to 8 and then went to 16Gbs. Newegg kept > having sales. lol > > Dale > > :-) :-) --90e6ba5bb989b65ad5049d473a2e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I actually have 4 gigs of gskill DDR 3 1600 and from experience I can te= ll you that the stock voltage on those chips is set too low.=A0 The company= actually recommends that you use 1.9 volts while most motherboards will de= fault to 1.5 or 1.6.=A0 Double check this however, because I know they were= working on some JEDEC compliant DDR 3 (standard voltage of 1.5) a while ba= ck but I'm not certain if they just decided to throw in the towel on th= at effort. My system would crash using 1.5 but wouldn't produce any err= ors on memtest86+.=A0 This all just sounds too familiar.

On Feb 26, 2011 11:15 AM, "Dale" <<= a href=3D"mailto:rdalek1967@gmail.com">rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:<= br type=3D"attribution">> Yohan Pereira wrote:
>>
>> O= n Saturday 26 Feb 2011 04:36:32 AM Dale wrote:
>>
>> >I booted a USB stick and it ran a long time with n= o problem.
>>
>>
>> ok this may have nothing to = do with it but was it a 32 bit OS on the
>> usb stick? does it us= e all 8 gigs?
>>
>>
>> dont know if this makes any diffrence thou= gh just guessing.
>>
>>
>> --
>>
&g= t;>
>> - Yohan Pereira
>>
>>
>> &quo= t;A man can do as he will, but not will as he will" - Schopenhauer
>>
>
>
> I booted a 64 bit. It did see all the r= am and I'm up to 16Gbs now. I
> started with 4, then went to 8 = and then went to 16Gbs. Newegg kept
> having sales. lol
> > Dale
>
> :-) :-)
--90e6ba5bb989b65ad5049d473a2e--