From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-111650-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1OM6Fz-0003h8-Ul
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 21:22:48 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9CFA2E0908;
Tue, 8 Jun 2010 21:22:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63EDDE0908
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 21:22:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wwb39 with SMTP id 39so2980177wwb.40
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 14:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=mftFYkTGeFBxhoUV+BgK1pIjqcIUgBgpwBoJiJ4Jht8=;
b=ru5TO5PlVXRRdJ+zTtkbiPrnxcoFJmEOY/UQW2hLcIY34EzqkYWOZmspuIONiBXAXR
x5SX1AXO/a3xtsg6uMFyzvOV3ni/MdG3cIPTbuZnmmVNvErCxslIBveK7HxvGucroKaN
Szo1WbXv3fMZeNM+24eNXj+DK9mCQUZ6jmJOU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=bl+NVQHs2HT4Kwvx+zrt7a4Y8PfH6bnk6bCj6VxiOgJ9f3CYuQexeesproolofC2xa
QGz/XckwCyV9upsxFPcv8lV00tvwgKUG9HASDXuEjaBJ5JTiiVQLeigdSgzmE6qd3Nun
gjDqbSHOGmpqr2cAd/ASOPCGgkrFOAobcZjLQ=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.170.83 with SMTP id o61mr4080488wel.37.1276032121673; Tue,
08 Jun 2010 14:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.177.10 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 14:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTil3Yzz_diSqGgYWQq3c_6NIDqShS8XuuRQzaIbc@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006072054.45620.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
<4C0D5585.6020903@gmail.com>
<201006072346.19926.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
<20100608104742.0850a91a@digimed.co.uk>
<AANLkTim1bjzgrbS8tOaKROrf8bQUO8IuBzWlgZe8MCZs@mail.gmail.com>
<AANLkTinW_1GLQZrd3clmtWvRljXJsPr-hUALpUgm1gCk@mail.gmail.com>
<AANLkTil3Yzz_diSqGgYWQq3c_6NIDqShS8XuuRQzaIbc@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 21:22:01 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTimL4ZDRIJIqSTuzsJYuwbNEi6T7ScDyEro3Enpw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] /var/tmp/portage not empty?
From: Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 25074781-e200-48f6-bcfc-af214ee29f01
X-Archives-Hash: 0c76eb7817eb9d818d59854c1047574a
On 8 June 2010 21:10, James Ausmus <james.ausmus@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com> wrote:
>> To save me from losing it, can you please tell me if your
>> /var/tmp/portage has such a stale file in there following your emerge
>> of gcc-4.4.3-r2 ? =A0Surely I can't blame the fs this time?
>
> Bizarre - out of curiousity, since you've already wiped the partition
> once - what happens if you dd/wipe/reformat again, but with ext2 or
> something similarly basic (and non-experimental)?
I'm two hours into an install now and would not really like to do
that. However, if I am faced with another fs failure after I reboot,
I will soon conclude that I have a hardware problem. The only catch
is that the OEM Windows 7 fs has not exhibited any problems yet,
because I've only booted into it a dozen times so far. Not even sure
if I can claim from the warranty for this laptop.
--=20
Regards,
Mick