From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-115234-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1P1IID-0005zI-V5
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:31:22 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26C6FE082F;
	Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:30:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDAA2E082F
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:30:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wyf28 with SMTP id 28so2569634wyf.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 05:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
         :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=6Mfbo/UQfHeBAE8ukRQcP2JiG0wPgCl8SP1jEsjA4HE=;
        b=AQPvCmof3abQQpiyg/vUgp542Accf3IovyX7m1UlHRZfZOu0wVTCio65/Ma2R+uhIr
         U3rGt91VXTBEQFGUJkP39aOGSmfhSiyCnwOo/h517XZtGUD1tySKmcqStMgF1c0jt2/Q
         LYJEihFRi6yQKSgoSXzQuwSe5M4aiDwTmWXRk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=TDJKToEYVgAbNsW66z5ML+PZpuMl60U/0Yplyg6S5sEHSaWHSc1XwiYkJiy4gRu6b0
         ok0Ln8HOWmhZT5HsCz3+26XhNbIC8JIws9zl0kyqqyW8PlrQp+R904P1G7Ui6+g/ioTg
         9+9C3UP/IUBggPCoeU+fTgk++Cb0RjD0niJI4=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.138.65 with SMTP id z43mr2956818wei.12.1285849853336; Thu,
 30 Sep 2010 05:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.26.68 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 05:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4CA47BEE.8050906@gmx.de>
References: <AANLkTintU9mSre7WP1oYZVyqeucLGehRotrLOv1AsOxR@mail.gmail.com>
	<4CA47BEE.8050906@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:30:53 +0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTim4nshaLPaTi7fCCobB5U18EHMk1b-B2oS5wJzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] firefox-bin optimizations?
From: Mark David Dumlao <madumlao@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: f8ae6e08-a869-48f6-96d0-6d10ba65e590
X-Archives-Hash: 67284f69a44827e65c223196d98fd2a4

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Johannes Kimmel <johannes.kimmel@gmx.de> w=
rote:
> On 09/30/2010 12:58 PM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>>
>> Heya,
>> I noticed that my firefox-bin is a lot smaller in memory footprint
>> compared to ordinary gentoo-compiled firefox.
>>
>> Does anyone know what compiler flags upstream applies to their
>> firefox? I turned off the custom-optimization USE on mine assuming
>> that it would follow upstream optimizations, but maybe it doesn't.
>>
>
> I thought firefox-bin is a 32-bit binary. If you are using a 64-bit gento=
o
> it is likely you self compiled version is a lot bigger.

That's right, firefox-bin is a 32bit binary, but I didn't expect the
Virt size to have a nearly 3x difference (855MB vs 355MB) when loading
the same tabs and running the same profile, or the Res size to have
nearly double (200MB vs 130MB).

Is this a speed vs size tradeoff thing? Because I noticed that my
compiled firefox is doing something like 10-30 points higher in the
google v8 benchmark than firefox-bin. But that's relatively a small
improvement, I think my system would do better overall with the giant
memory use reduction.

Or is there an issue with having both firefoxes using the same profile
dirs (not at the same time though).

--=20
This email is:=A0 =A0 [ ] actionable=A0=A0 [ ] fyi=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 [ ] socia=
l
Response needed:=A0 [ ] yes=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 [ ] up to you=A0 [ ] no
Time-sensitive:=A0=A0 [ ] immediate=A0 =A0 [ ] soon=A0 =A0 =A0=A0 [ ] none