From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OGCvm-0007dt-0e for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 15:17:34 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C1CCFE0857; Sun, 23 May 2010 15:16:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (mail-bw0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A267E0857 for ; Sun, 23 May 2010 15:16:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz18 with SMTP id 18so585867bwz.40 for ; Sun, 23 May 2010 08:16:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=WKNwUEFjbxiu9fAaIFe3P4pS1uQVtLNBYL0WNvHLeHs=; b=hAjlkKFL92rFnuF0JXCQpS8wsJBkWFfFj8djrUBYk+d2E3LcmR5rpLB/yrcu0LZuIF IfrWz4w7yRMK92oGBDKErjMMpPhAJRltC5gBVdybiiuY3Kmg0W5U+LUFWOGLdbZFW9SA 71I6sUt78L38OqM/N8+p1g6cYIt8nzaujVpDg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=K9uw2Pn14eWZFkjqsTRg2/4IC56qVEvtsc7OshRj50zBwv6WkbPEKa2Tr8TQpJ3eeB sYcnEfTuQTMNVpA0BNu58Zf6me1KfQNvuh8HjrQ9bFvAMW+Ehhfuq/VzzxX8T9UJc7Du 0bRXJW15jBAGOw0nZPeObByT4zMxVf9FHxEdY= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.80.99 with SMTP id s35mr1312779bkk.183.1274627813850; Sun, 23 May 2010 08:16:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.38.85 with HTTP; Sun, 23 May 2010 08:16:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100523105710.556f469b@osage.osagesoftware.com> References: <20100522161039.2c52d639@osage.osagesoftware.com> <20100523092457.6f5773a7@osage.osagesoftware.com> <20100523105710.556f469b@osage.osagesoftware.com> Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 18:16:53 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Java problem From: "Arttu V." To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 5d95d20b-3814-4fec-a7f9-826611ca375a X-Archives-Hash: 1e3c022700844c8df6187bff54635c7d On 5/23/10, David Relson wrote: > Hi Arttu, > > The portage tree is fine, AFAICT. emerge finds the ebuild, but > the emerge fails. Removing "--jobs 4" doesn't change the result. Ok, then that could be discarded as just some wild speculation. Next idea, how about just marking a single arch: > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64 x86" I don't know if the java ebuilds, eclasses and wrapper-scripts are wise enough to figure out the correct dependencies with such keywords. I could imagine some part might figure out the arch as x86, but then your system vm would be set to the x86_64 vm, i.e., no x86 system vm set ... (again, just some more wild speculation ;) ) -- Arttu V.