* [gentoo-user] p7zip-4.65-r1 considered obnoxious
@ 2010-06-20 15:44 Kevin O'Gorman
2010-06-20 17:19 ` Renat Golubchyk
2010-06-20 17:29 ` Arttu V.
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kevin O'Gorman @ 2010-06-20 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 222 bytes --]
For some reason, the latest x86 stable p7zip wants to force me to remove
'odbc' from wxGTK. This seems wrong, and I'm masking it out for the moment,
but I'm wondering what justification there is.
--
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 274 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] p7zip-4.65-r1 considered obnoxious
2010-06-20 15:44 [gentoo-user] p7zip-4.65-r1 considered obnoxious Kevin O'Gorman
@ 2010-06-20 17:19 ` Renat Golubchyk
2010-06-20 18:35 ` Kevin O'Gorman
2010-06-20 17:29 ` Arttu V.
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Renat Golubchyk @ 2010-06-20 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 603 bytes --]
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 08:44:41 -0700 "Kevin O'Gorman"
<kogorman@gmail.com> wrote:
> For some reason, the latest x86 stable p7zip wants to force me to
> remove 'odbc' from wxGTK. This seems wrong, and I'm masking it out
> for the moment, but I'm wondering what justification there is.
Well, you could check the ChangeLog in app-arch/p7zip directory for
yourself, but since I've already done it just look at bug #267698.
Cheers,
Renat
--
Probleme kann man niemals mit derselben Denkweise loesen,
durch die sie entstanden sind.
(Einstein)
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] p7zip-4.65-r1 considered obnoxious
2010-06-20 15:44 [gentoo-user] p7zip-4.65-r1 considered obnoxious Kevin O'Gorman
2010-06-20 17:19 ` Renat Golubchyk
@ 2010-06-20 17:29 ` Arttu V.
2010-06-25 18:10 ` Enrico Weigelt
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Arttu V. @ 2010-06-20 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 6/20/10, Kevin O'Gorman <kogorman@gmail.com> wrote:
> For some reason, the latest x86 stable p7zip wants to force me to remove
> 'odbc' from wxGTK. This seems wrong, and I'm masking it out for the moment,
> but I'm wondering what justification there is.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=267698
--
Arttu V.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] p7zip-4.65-r1 considered obnoxious
2010-06-20 17:19 ` Renat Golubchyk
@ 2010-06-20 18:35 ` Kevin O'Gorman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kevin O'Gorman @ 2010-06-20 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 710 bytes --]
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Renat Golubchyk <ragermany@gmx.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 08:44:41 -0700 "Kevin O'Gorman"
> <kogorman@gmail.com> wrote:
> > For some reason, the latest x86 stable p7zip wants to force me to
> > remove 'odbc' from wxGTK. This seems wrong, and I'm masking it out
> > for the moment, but I'm wondering what justification there is.
>
> Well, you could check the ChangeLog in app-arch/p7zip directory for
> yourself, but since I've already done it just look at bug #267698.
>
> Thanks. So it's a WONTFIX because upstream is dropping ODBC anyway to make
room for Unicode.
Standards are SO wonderful -- there are so many to choose from.
++ kevin
--
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1143 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] p7zip-4.65-r1 considered obnoxious
2010-06-20 17:29 ` Arttu V.
@ 2010-06-25 18:10 ` Enrico Weigelt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Enrico Weigelt @ 2010-06-25 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
* Arttu V. <arttuv69@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/20/10, Kevin O'Gorman <kogorman@gmail.com> wrote:
> > For some reason, the latest x86 stable p7zip wants to force me to remove
> > 'odbc' from wxGTK. This seems wrong, and I'm masking it out for the moment,
> > but I'm wondering what justification there is.
>
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=267698
Yet another case of different packages bundled into one ;-p
When looking at the rather complex ebuild, I'd claim that
upstream is not well-designed (so distros have to do things
which naturally would be upstream's job) .... ;-o
cu
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
http://patches.metux.de/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-25 18:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-06-20 15:44 [gentoo-user] p7zip-4.65-r1 considered obnoxious Kevin O'Gorman
2010-06-20 17:19 ` Renat Golubchyk
2010-06-20 18:35 ` Kevin O'Gorman
2010-06-20 17:29 ` Arttu V.
2010-06-25 18:10 ` Enrico Weigelt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox