From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-115804-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1P8Pm6-0003qS-Ar
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 03:55:39 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7B56E0698;
Wed, 20 Oct 2010 03:54:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1882E0698
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 03:54:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wwb17 with SMTP id 17so2218620wwb.10
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 20:54:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=dkgQd1fCEw/64Iwh/7J+saeoJQNt395A8W9AUOuFcFk=;
b=fAnH2IpE//A0Ke+40DNF02urg/u4z6Y3g04NUvkE8gdFh1cQBxq1hnjah1n4RjbQOP
rR+pFprnvyZ5Lt/m0hZr0kCV/mmEPHBp3WgmPscUeQxnXmEUnpipc+J5AtDIh8kUpD6z
vH5ycRQyXvBzmHfxlUmwWGd1JyGeXRzngkvgo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
b=PsAP9q+88PeO//p28aE6ky8NNjO7V2RezAYKGDMaY/KZL46EN8KYqZYo7JJ0ixvCAa
v2oh4o2CaG4XLP6LfkGLv0hPpA86d2mFKJuptps8E2NOaYBUh5QBVCgrsdCSK+rz+c6G
UXFhPwwYe+hbNX3GOAjyk5JLrvk4vmNArAqIQ=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.64.205 with SMTP id c55mr7553974wed.88.1287546863177; Tue,
19 Oct 2010 20:54:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.50.67 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 20:54:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4CBE33B6.8020405@gmail.com>
References: <4CBD4C85.2010500@gmail.com>
<AANLkTim2jqC0M+GYyJRb3fJP5BYGzeue5dSkadqRP_Hx@mail.gmail.com>
<4CBDFF4F.3000907@gmail.com>
<AANLkTikU0KnRVgQgYGpQeNnQhh1jOtb=qT2BgNjxN4T4@mail.gmail.com>
<AANLkTinWjngqtpyYjPbEN=iQMSQPQsC+Rq9-J9oji8oq@mail.gmail.com>
<4CBE33B6.8020405@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:54:23 +1100
Message-ID: <AANLkTikzTva0CwBdUGyV4i303YSG_noMqHth4uqXGHPn@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrading from FX-5200 to a GeForce 6200 512MB
From: Adam Carter <adamcarter3@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0ce0040a6950e50493045dc2
X-Archives-Salt: 31c8679b-4f5e-4890-ad9e-ec9db282a79f
X-Archives-Hash: c27c351e52967dd031ef03410baec7dd
--000e0ce0040a6950e50493045dc2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Nice link. I didn't even think of looking on that site. I guess one good
> thing to go by is the processing power and memory. After all, that's what
> makes it all work faster. Looks like I'm still getting a pretty old card
> but I don't play any hard core games or anything. Playing videos is about
> as much load as the card will see with me. I do play Kpatience tho. Love
> my card games.
>
>
I would have thought you would have no problems at all with your current
system. IIRC I had no problem with full screen SD video using mplayer on a
Athlon 2200 with a crappy integrated 440MX video... what's the CPU
utilization when you're playing the full screen video?
I'm just thinking changing the card might not make any difference.
--000e0ce0040a6950e50493045dc2
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"m=
argin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); paddin=
g-left: 1ex;"><div text=3D"#000000" bgcolor=3D"#ffffff">
Nice link.=A0 I didn't even think of looking on that site.=A0 I guess o=
ne
good thing to go by is the processing power and memory.=A0 After all,
that's what makes it all work faster.=A0 Looks like I'm still getti=
ng a
pretty old card but I don't play any hard core games or anything.=A0
Playing videos is about as much load as the card will see with me.=A0 I
do play Kpatience tho.=A0 Love my card games.=A0 <br>
<br></div></blockquote></div><br>I would have thought you would have no pro=
blems at all with your current system. IIRC I had no problem with full scre=
en SD video using mplayer on a Athlon 2200 with a crappy integrated 440MX v=
ideo... what's the CPU utilization when you're playing the full scr=
een video?<br>
<br>I'm just thinking changing the card might not make any difference.<=
br>
--000e0ce0040a6950e50493045dc2--