From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1P8e3O-0006Uu-8o for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:10:32 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 62347E073B for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:10:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C6EEE06B1 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:07:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm8 with SMTP id 8so3905033fxm.40 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:07:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4kc7Zdc6rvq0DGTgpddsUIO9tmck1tQBR7w90xpmwUM=; b=SLF4snn8biGyHe9grfWxhGCQrLnr89a0p+yxR5JnbvC54UecpAETkOOkR+dNRjfop4 w9ga5hmOpNDJdS3mtgRVqQD8wMFtftj2nZcCUqzVrKEkUBKGDtpe1g5dO0y1yI60uYFX 93m3yvOds3HQXw+iI+jXmF9T5dGvUt+PLRGK4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=o9guNV5ZSmkFTICF0xAVaN2RjDQxex2ehNeWGRFlMc7D+MibreQ0ZyRMDWzO6hd2o2 K9Ks4UP8fSo4XqMgIGpu3xH8slNqBqbbihPtOMaVL5wy4YgLvTzbebzdnh6iIWMAvOi7 tHuzRK4GiyE/O6u7CmnO4DfX309TzIUeeYisQ= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.166.66 with SMTP id a2mr86337hbe.91.1287601643435; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:07:23 -0700 (PDT) Sender: paul.hartman@gmail.com Received: by 10.239.162.67 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:07:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CBF3436.3020009@gmail.com> References: <4CBD4C85.2010500@gmail.com> <4CBDFF4F.3000907@gmail.com> <4CBE33B6.8020405@gmail.com> <4CBE6C31.9050607@gmail.com> <4CBF3436.3020009@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:07:22 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0BFsIPrZjbhhuA_3dCQ-ImtqNHs Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrading from FX-5200 to a GeForce 6200 512MB From: Paul Hartman To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 01e92a4e-5a78-4469-9546-97ed74fcb7e9 X-Archives-Hash: b2a91464333b0b70251a1ee2de1e072f On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Dale wrote: > I appear to have another issue to deal with right now. =A0This is weird. = =A0When > I type in any nvclock command, I get something like this: > > root@smoker / # nvclock -i > *** buffer overflow detected ***: nvclock terminated Seems like maybe that is glibc stopping you from running a program with a (potential) buffer overflow. You can set an environment variable to make it stop doing that and let you run the program anyway, assuming you don't want to edit nvclock's source code to fix the problem. :) Try: MALLOC_CHECK_=3D0 nvclock -i ("man malloc" for more info)