From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-119711-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1Pm9As-0003Mj-NV
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 18:17:26 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3168EE0ABF
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 6 Feb 2011 18:17:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1C7C1C008
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 6 Feb 2011 17:59:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wyf22 with SMTP id 22so5113998wyf.40
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 09:59:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=G3Wu7FpewDDNhZP/AgpPm3+gyiry9e9vJfxAJeKxq8g=;
b=OfStP4Wg1i+Ajl4WqUItlET7cWQpzHSfpX9L+SB+63WrIpP7ZsRH1ZB6Yf7Hopo5Kz
QoVLXPaxFVuVKiZK1iC94zT+9Tg2K60EUSmf9WSVU1wijuDDBdoNGPV4XK5PcUnpClm2
SoAZEqbwgwM6NG1heAdMO6xpeWBQQrSPBkR9c=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
b=Fr21trnFJyZlf7g4+xHW7m61DNJKFJenIZVs0062c7QbKt7Qab/496/5AaLmqBRrBa
mNoUQ1AjqsA6jIUsWagqMNnbgYhT3k4OZjo/IM+dsH0A98IV/v4C24HWRNiHiu+r96oE
qWcMsMx9emMBf6a/VU4PRecYX9Ut3eEbSle7s=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.188.67 with SMTP id z45mr13331242wem.7.1297015199107; Sun,
06 Feb 2011 09:59:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.89.81 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Feb 2011 09:59:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinknh2fTHJ1QxkcNqHNw=Oub9iF8ORLJT5aDQv0@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=4Wdd5QnGpR8qjPYmkDmswxRr5zVyjnQfBbC87@mail.gmail.com>
<iimkjd$dj3$1@dough.gmane.org>
<AANLkTinknh2fTHJ1QxkcNqHNw=Oub9iF8ORLJT5aDQv0@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 09:59:59 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTiki0jWEev5kAmW=VO8+VxWe9s2YwPg+wU9RHBYb@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: IDE recommendations for writing C?
From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt:
X-Archives-Hash: 79e38d345452a1f8dcca69bf76ba7edd
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com> wrote:
<SNIP>
> I'll take a look at it. Do you recommend the testing 2.0 versions or stable 1.3?
<SNIP>
Never mind on the 2.0 item. I run stable and that would require about
15 qt packages to be unmasked. Not interested in going there right now
- maybe later.
Cheers,
Mark