From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OnApD-0001ir-AX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 13:43:03 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 58066E0819; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 13:29:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vw0-f53.google.com (mail-vw0-f53.google.com [209.85.212.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F0CE080B for ; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 13:29:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws15 with SMTP id 15so5317728vws.40 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 06:29:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MqJM2Cs3z8SxThTlau61i1xBXoWuNkqdN2lq9C3nrMQ=; b=UTPWX1fWaqojS+n1GdTqU6d9Pjt4N1ePSOx7GrzyCKXPvK9+NM1skTM0L85x/jeC+c xyGwEHttXKgGf6uDV7WB6HaMhwPFEzK3kinee+GUYTYjAxrjkiZtJTu6aNaFBu1bRNbF MnJLUTqa+I2Lcdg7CD1Szte3IAhaK35HFdGAE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=dtTijwMjAHy4bT8StXZ3Sg2L1qvqCBMhZneSz0XKCKX1mtEA6IKsUB583YyVOpbpnW xj41Q3vCQUXlXGXPZSwjMS3xxXUGWPEX0MfzMDpgY3ZqhwpWC5HNH0T5r31clhC/3+0r 44pYnVRKjhWQocpMTa+lW8ufLkRju4RSKofuo= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.109.220 with SMTP id k28mr2400035vcp.122.1282483749858; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 06:29:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.198.138 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 06:29:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <17550.1282481535@ccs.covici.com> References: <17550.1282481535@ccs.covici.com> Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 16:29:09 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] glibc 2.12.1-r1 seems to not be working correctly From: "Arttu V." To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: b233e93c-8fbd-41c1-b524-2627b7e1bc69 X-Archives-Hash: 9b3240733f779d6940cf231a96fa3291 On 8/22/10, covici@ccs.covici.com wrote: > Hi. I am running the unstable gentoo 32-bit and today I emerged -- > amoung other packages in a system update -- glibc-2.12.1-r1, however > after doing this at least one package had an undefined reference to > S_ISCHR. I tried to downgrade glibc, but apparently this is not > supported and I am a bit stumped as to how to fix this problem. > > Any ideas on this would be appreciated. Which package is failing? Please check if it is already reported, and if not then please report a new bug, and if possible make it block this tracker bug: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331665 A wild guess out of the blue would be that the error could be simply a missing include of stat.h in the package's sources. But there might be other omissions as well, so please provide more info. I think that unless API/ABIs were changed then the older, already installed version should still work just fine, as then the missing includes would only affect compile-time situation. -- Arttu V. -- Running Gentoo is like running with scissors