From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1PBjzF-0000u6-TC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:06:58 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B7A3E0B13 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:06:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gy0-f181.google.com (mail-gy0-f181.google.com [209.85.160.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20219E0ABA for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 07:58:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gye5 with SMTP id 5so2651187gye.40 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:58:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BAaos5aL3UPVmGud5MjFOs2ulnmnHg1KMWM4R60C+XE=; b=QTVUNG0fzIOluHP1bsPvVUU5vi7b5r27SYNdM3CkKUND3V6in/VUIbJRXrvDaqloSb KuZSpI0H5GfyHG9mDaW0NMUqe+otU+rQoTzrmXjT/1hcD+S0LbDX2FQz2Nv781vKe5Jo MnVFOxohzdWx7QMrg8sdcY46a7dx9AM176PMs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=jeEWjzHwrRtIKkrDBu8O49PaZ1eDhy0bvL2xi4a+KgsIqyf2o2IimjpzJvTbDdaH5d CY5ZpTY+3Fb8NeJEH9MHzSA1NovI/NRNaeF6ylGxp3tGueJTTTGp8v7TGg/3B0A140Wy oeFJhr0PPFupDUuncfkyIfGhcOrQisrK/P0Wg= Received: by 10.91.11.30 with SMTP id o30mr4106810agi.94.1288339132698; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:58:52 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: fthtmn@gmail.com Received: by 10.90.150.3 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:58:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101028192134.19ab52f7@digimed.co.uk> References: <8739rribwc.fsf@newsguy.com> <20101028012351.GC4302@ca.inter.net> <87mxpzf1cb.fsf@newsguy.com> <201010281026.20648.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <20101028192134.19ab52f7@digimed.co.uk> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fatih_T=FCmen?= Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:58:21 +0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: oDpuKfXSPC_vnrX3ee9NKejDlZ0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: scrapping hal To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: f79a48c7-80de-4cb2-b7c4-b5a080f591b3 X-Archives-Hash: 30a443575dc65ef32b211b02014ba349 On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 21:21, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:11:42 +0300, Fatih T=FCmen wrote: > >> I agree putting -hal is not a good idea unless you dare to break the >> packages that need hal. But I think there is a third option here > > Packages that need hal won't have a hal use flag. > True, not every package that needs hal has hal use flag. I should have made clear that my implication was those which have (optional) dependency on hal && (thus) has hal flag. For packages that need hal it doesn't matter whether you have -hal in your make.conf anyway, does it? -- =A0 =A0Fatih > > -- > Neil Bothwick > > Oxymoron: Reagan memoirs. >