From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-115283-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1P1Ps6-0007K7-UX
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:36:55 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D19AFE0B98;
	Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:36:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9305BE0B98
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:36:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wwb34 with SMTP id 34so487318wwb.10
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:36:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
         :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=B4AWXG/xzyfLzxk3wyz4jVgLPlPfGV2UzWJ8JcVuoCY=;
        b=YhoUjhmiHiIFd2N8dGhwNHo6meNoXr2E6NIIJ213SCFMLgsFhWMwSSlWECthwceJem
         vSq0fEpZ1GjpqlALoZXdJ2Q2Ww+kS4k3AZqjmsvKIl+J1xTonuMzrhP1/0O6QV1YwLxw
         DB3juApX1ZuO27bhj1PuB+VXus5euRlsxkkSs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=Dlg1jAAt0vZpY6IVVzeO8JlT/zFLyAKpmzb7+ZrQomdzFd2DSNBHyi9y+ed30tEfik
         p3OVvkOMi0mEiXyjcVZ7CHMIr+wN9eWBYevDXljuPH0QZPPGKihLJ/XHBaIw5JiabFhW
         x8HOXMo5Z5l3oarB37oBwolgXNR47Q+q9ZLqE=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.233.163 with SMTP id p35mr1221313weq.98.1285879008981;
 Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:36:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.26.68 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:36:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <i82otf$ith$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <AANLkTintU9mSre7WP1oYZVyqeucLGehRotrLOv1AsOxR@mail.gmail.com>
	<4CA47BEE.8050906@gmx.de>
	<AANLkTim4nshaLPaTi7fCCobB5U18EHMk1b-B2oS5wJzQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<i82otf$ith$1@dough.gmane.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 04:36:48 +0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=sWOUwmop7RGKPyWzGHNbfAQaYAfRMNeeRui8C@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: firefox-bin optimizations?
From: Mark David Dumlao <madumlao@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: d6c06d98-c606-41aa-8a7f-37378f5f3e3d
X-Archives-Hash: de595ad5f814e2a2e66fccd4305e81e7

On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 3:37 AM, walt <w41ter@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 09/30/2010 05:30 AM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Johannes Kimmel<johannes.kimmel@gmx.de>
>> =A0wrote:
>>>
>>> On 09/30/2010 12:58 PM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Heya,
>>>> I noticed that my firefox-bin is a lot smaller in memory footprint
>>>> compared to ordinary gentoo-compiled firefox.
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone know what compiler flags upstream applies to their
>>>> firefox?
>
> Try entering about:buildconfig in the URL bar.

Thanks! that's totally what I was looking for.

--=20
This email is:=A0 =A0 [ ] actionable=A0=A0 [ ] fyi=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 [ ] socia=
l
Response needed:=A0 [ ] yes=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 [ ] up to you=A0 [ ] no
Time-sensitive:=A0=A0 [ ] immediate=A0 =A0 [ ] soon=A0 =A0 =A0=A0 [ ] none