From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5yIj-0000gj-Dw for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 10:43:29 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ABD971C050; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 10:41:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-iy0-f181.google.com (mail-iy0-f181.google.com [209.85.210.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 743071C050 for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 10:41:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so5470116iyb.40 for ; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 03:41:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/23m7G4jxTtEqpt5kreIvnk7uBNfW2cfRTnOZ9F2Cb4=; b=cFvl8zY8kzme41/TqZIOrG1QHuLKDvQ8TNMcWUUlEetQvDl8K16CoZ27vOFucri4QG WlgyiOyfqbNRuijVnz7uVx1fMsa6/TbMw3SDCzNlV1dlUaLWTbhigNOXaQMH24t8VYfH gOC1RfPUJjwJ00bGbTxN7m40XsRU7KzK3ghXU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=C9qUfOqB0f5gQPvMxnZrEKX0WWJtlCA4JsAfZ+6NydB8cBn8U2astOGWsvKN069L6v P+DlkbRBvZhrM4fLxHg4xux3Kr2kymZGpECeb22NK6m1TUEAE3FdF8p9vuh3TgNAuHNi gH6JbfmsdXnB2lD4aF/ZZOBYKJ84tWWk5QnjU= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.154.198 with SMTP id r6mr3294858icw.166.1301740914799; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 03:41:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.77.69 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 03:41:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4d962ff9.1882cc0a.4b16.ffff90e1@mx.google.com> References: <4d962ff9.1882cc0a.4b16.ffff90e1@mx.google.com> Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 18:41:54 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Adobe-flash becomes quite slow. From: Einux To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba61365ad0f40c049fed2c51 X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 4814c38847d3dd4e6113dc645d23ba91 --90e6ba61365ad0f40c049fed2c51 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I use strace to trace syscalls of `/opt/Adobe/flash-player/libflashplayer.so` and found many errors like this: {{{ madvise(0xdf20000, 3424256, MADV_DONTNEED) = 0 --- SIGPROF (Profiling timer expired) @ 0 (0) --- madvise(0xdf20000, 3424256, MADV_DONTNEED) = 0 --- SIGPROF (Profiling timer expired) @ 0 (0) --- madvise(0xdf20000, 3424256, MADV_DONTNEED) = 0 --- SIGPROF (Profiling timer expired) @ 0 (0) --- --- SIGPROF (Profiling timer expired) @ 0 (0) --- madvise(0xdf20000, 3424256, MADV_DONTNEED) = 0 --- SIGPROF (Profiling timer expired) @ 0 (0) --- madvise(0xdf20000, 3424256, MADV_DONTNEED) = 0 --- SIGPROF (Profiling timer expired) @ 0 (0) --- madvise(0xdf20000, 3424256, MADV_DONTNEED) = 0 --- SIGPROF (Profiling timer expired) @ 0 (0) --- madvise(0xdf20000, 3424256, MADV_DONTNEED) = 0 --- SIGPROF (Profiling timer expired) @ 0 (0) --- madvise(0xdf20000, 3424256, MADV_DONTNEED) = 0 --- SIGPROF (Profiling timer expired) @ 0 (0) --- madvise(0xdf20000, 3424256, MADV_DONTNEED) = 0 --- SIGPROF (Profiling timer expired) @ 0 (0) --- --- SIGPROF (Profiling timer expired) @ 0 (0) --- madvise(0xdf20000, 3424256, MADV_DONTNEED) = 0 --- SIGPROF (Profiling timer expired) @ 0 (0) --- madvise(0xdf20000, 3424256, MADV_DONTNEED) = 0 --- SIGPROF (Profiling timer expired) @ 0 (0) --- madvise(0xdf20000, 3424256, MADV_DONTNEED) = 0 --- SIGPROF (Profiling timer expired) @ 0 (0) --- }}} Any ideas? Thanks in advance :) On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann < volkerarmin@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Friday 01 April 2011 22:35:39 Einux wrote: > > Adobe-flash becomes quite slow in my laptop after I updated world(or > maybe I > > reconfigured kernel options) several days ago. I've made a lot of > > modifications, so I'm not sure exactly which action leads to the > malfunction > > of adobe-flash. > > adobe flash is just slow with composite. And its performance differs > greatly > between minor versions. > > -- Best Regards, Einux --90e6ba61365ad0f40c049fed2c51 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I use strace to trace syscalls of `/opt/Adobe/= flash-player/libflashplayer.so` and found many errors like this:{{{
madvise(0xdf20000, 3424256, MADV_DONTNEED) =3D 0
--- SIGPROF (Pro= filing timer expired) @ 0 (0) ---
madvise(0xdf20000, 3424256, MAD= V_DONTNEED) =3D 0
--- SIGPROF (Profiling timer expired) @ 0 (0) -= --
madvise(0xdf20000, 3424256, MADV_DONTNEED) =3D 0
--- SIGPROF= (Profiling timer expired) @ 0 (0) ---
--- SIGPROF (Profiling tim= er expired) @ 0 (0) ---
madvise(0xdf20000, 3424256, MADV_DONTNEED= ) =3D 0
--- SIGPROF (Profiling timer expired) @ 0 (0) ---
madvise(0x= df20000, 3424256, MADV_DONTNEED) =3D 0
--- SIGPROF (Profiling tim= er expired) @ 0 (0) ---
madvise(0xdf20000, 3424256, MADV_DONTNEED= ) =3D 0
--- SIGPROF (Profiling timer expired) @ 0 (0) ---
madvise(0x= df20000, 3424256, MADV_DONTNEED) =3D 0
--- SIGPROF (Profiling tim= er expired) @ 0 (0) ---
madvise(0xdf20000, 3424256, MADV_DONTNEED= ) =3D 0
--- SIGPROF (Profiling timer expired) @ 0 (0) ---
madvise(0x= df20000, 3424256, MADV_DONTNEED) =3D 0
--- SIGPROF (Profiling tim= er expired) @ 0 (0) ---
--- SIGPROF (Profiling timer expired) @ 0= (0) ---
madvise(0xdf20000, 3424256, MADV_DONTNEED) =3D 0
--- SIGPROF= (Profiling timer expired) @ 0 (0) ---
madvise(0xdf20000, 3424256= , MADV_DONTNEED) =3D 0
--- SIGPROF (Profiling timer expired) @ 0 = (0) ---
madvise(0xdf20000, 3424256, MADV_DONTNEED) =3D 0
--- SIGPROF= (Profiling timer expired) @ 0 (0) ---
}}}

Any ideas?

Thanks in advance :)
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Volker Armin Hem= mann <vo= lkerarmin@googlemail.com> wrote:
On Friday 01 April 2011 22:35:39 Einux wrote:
> Adobe-flash becomes quite slow in my laptop after I updated world(or m= aybe I
> reconfigured kernel options) several days ago. I've made a lot of<= br> > modifications, so I'm not sure exactly which action leads to the m= alfunction
> of adobe-flash.

adobe flash is just slow with composite. And its performance differs = greatly
between minor versions.




--
Best Regards,
Einux<= /div>
--90e6ba61365ad0f40c049fed2c51--