From: Mike Gilbert <floppymaster@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Why is KDE part of the system set?
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:59:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=WuEOC-ngR-FNbY+hEGgzquhu2ZjCaf2BW=nvA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D691B22.8000300@gmail.com>
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't object to having X stuff installed, I just don't think it should be
> pulled into the system set.
The system set (@system) is comprised ONLY of the packages listed in
the various "packages" files under /usr/portage/profiles. The
dependencies of the packages are NOT part of @system.
What you are saying is that packages in @system should never be
allowed to optionally have GUI functionality enabled. That's just
stupid.
If you want the smalled possible depgraph for @system, don't enable
any USE flags for the packages in @system. It is just that simple.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-26 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-23 4:28 [gentoo-user] Why is KDE part of the system set? Dale
2011-02-23 9:29 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-02-23 11:47 ` Dale
2011-02-23 12:25 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-02-23 15:57 ` Dale
2011-02-23 22:52 ` Mike Edenfield
2011-02-24 0:16 ` Dale
2011-02-24 0:48 ` Alex Schuster
2011-02-24 11:40 ` Sebastian Beßler
2011-02-24 12:19 ` Dale
2011-02-24 2:08 ` Walter Dnes
2011-02-24 12:32 ` Dale
2011-02-24 12:47 ` Sebastian Beßler
2011-02-24 13:03 ` Dale
2011-02-24 13:23 ` Sebastian Beßler
2011-02-24 14:08 ` Dale
2011-02-24 14:55 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-02-24 15:21 ` Dale
2011-02-24 16:12 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-02-24 17:34 ` Dale
2011-02-24 19:35 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-02-25 1:08 ` Walter Dnes
2011-02-26 4:10 ` Dale
2011-02-26 13:54 ` Mark Knecht
2011-02-26 14:43 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-02-26 15:24 ` Dale
2011-02-26 15:46 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-02-26 21:59 ` Mike Gilbert [this message]
2011-02-24 17:32 ` Sebastian Beßler
2011-02-24 17:41 ` Mark Knecht
2011-02-24 17:52 ` Mark Knecht
2011-02-23 12:57 ` Joost Roeleveld
2011-02-23 14:31 ` Mark Knecht
[not found] <gpf97-vC-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <gpjmq-7Ig-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <gplxU-2ZI-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <gpm0V-3W6-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <gpprR-1yy-43@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <gpyY9-15c-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <gpIEa-Q1-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <gpINP-141-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <gpJ7d-1M3-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
2011-02-24 13:32 ` Elaine C. Sharpe
2011-02-24 14:18 ` Dale
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTi=WuEOC-ngR-FNbY+hEGgzquhu2ZjCaf2BW=nvA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=floppymaster@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=rdalek1967@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox