From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q3caH-0000jY-OS for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 23:07:53 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D2671C066; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 23:06:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qw0-f53.google.com (mail-qw0-f53.google.com [209.85.216.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342C71C066 for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 23:06:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwb7 with SMTP id 7so1165433qwb.40 for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 16:06:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=LIK3bVmNfc7ktzmaMdQT3Ao+0omL6vW5tIzFDtprGg8=; b=ofyAvPZUQV+UJZyfjLiFdems23Ekpzei2Dc50PBlBU5joxCj0fYMBRlHhOuRf/p4VB YNnyoJ6UHKfMfnS5/+ftyVBz2/hu5xg4HlOwpgWq8R36JjhYjHHEI88R+BMjzTfRHY2N zywjcYAl84srasyMca12G0diDDEp3nKk8Kq0U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=DU70wQg3MGapogVDsOnFfALeCNowfVcX3c4eAh7AZ1dKiy/IrrU4mV+g7o0G/31frQ pqDv5exyakLD7IqVydWHjoSOCL88Ai2CL3uQht9xgpfTGewz7vL1jCHkGcVb3S0ripto NMzMkj7aGPefRtcCwb1TntmKPksFBrmuku5DU= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.26.140 with SMTP id e12mr1983993qcc.297.1301180780511; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 16:06:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.19.138 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 16:06:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4D8BE1B3.80807@gmail.com> <201103252009.50877.stephane@22decembre.eu> <20110325203811.3239e4fc@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <20110326211654.589a147f@digimed.co.uk> Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:06:20 +1100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] python-2.7 && python-updater From: Adam Carter To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636831e7e36038f049f6ac25c X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 656650298c18b22cb2c841a931495824 --001636831e7e36038f049f6ac25c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > I guess I'm not clear on the use of 'manual' here. They are > automatically added. If they are correctly rebuilt then they shouldn't > need to be added a second time, correct? However they are. (Over and > over...) > > Basically, it is my understanding that if everything is correctly > updated then on the second pass it should say there's nothing to do, > right? > No > > I mean, I can add anything to a list of things not to build, but I > don't know why I'd add them vs just letting it run and telling me it's > doing them a 2nd/3rd time and feeling the job must be done. > > I assume there is stuff in these packages that is somehow hard linked > to python-2.6 libraries or something and one of these days that will > get fixed? > > - Mark > > RTFM :) manual python-updater has a list of packages that are known to break by Python upgrades but can't be determined by methods specified above. This check can be disabled if you're sure you've rebuilt the package once and it's OK now. Enabled by default. --001636831e7e36038f049f6ac25c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I guess I'm = not clear on the use of 'manual' here. They are
automatically added. If they are correctly rebuilt then they shouldn't<= br> need to be added a second time, correct? However they are. (Over and
over...)

Basically, it is my understanding that if everything is correctly
updated then on the second pass it should say there's nothing to do, right?

No

I mean, I can add anything to a list of things not to build, but I
don't know why I'd add them vs just letting it run and telling me i= t's
doing them a 2nd/3rd time and feeling the job must be done.

I assume there is stuff in these packages that is somehow hard linked
to python-2.6 libraries or something and one of these days that will
get fixed?

- Mark


RTFM :)

=A0=A0=A0=A0 manual
=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 python-updater has a list of packages that are kno= wn to break
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 by Python upgrades but can= 9;t be determined by methods specified
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 ab= ove. This check can be disabled if you're sure you've rebuilt
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 the package once and it's OK now.
=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Enabled by default.
--001636831e7e36038f049f6ac25c--