From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-117402-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1POhUn-0003Je-4S
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 02:05:05 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADB39E0BCC
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 02:05:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B6EEE0632
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 01:20:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wyf22 with SMTP id 22so20573162wyf.40
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 17:20:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=SROMtq1kLZpHGs2gQkmIJXpcFjgtViKCsZNPCwoMjsk=;
b=Vdls5Hzw3OA5ZIz/q+JGVyi4dyzznMvJMYOmqJzZfXJMvAS+WaQy3Dlapy+hAxQdBa
BBm/HzZFiYLMiyeatFUOL/RD1U2sMQy4RAB+TdzO7KleH5nig1v5Xx0ylNBwEjJklSUf
LUuL569M0LPpZsNIwxBXk2Lh05JIk4n4xJAYo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=HWL3bSGxv4JedevHLKYCBfB7kJYAS0W5WNwmDf5GX47SfwappUgi4PYIs0Jl++4H0E
gglidD0ySozkVbzxRspC9YT2/h8SNmOjsL5yuUW7tyehJoD0pOmg8f4ls8xByEbn3b0V
uMPShJ1Iqa4yTYs8SJ7kz8EBgo/ddYKzsBevU=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.176.20 with SMTP id a20mr2418812wem.14.1291425616508; Fri,
03 Dec 2010 17:20:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.233.90 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 17:20:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1291423310.13545.8.camel@rattus>
References: <1291423310.13545.8.camel@rattus>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 17:20:16 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=57ha8uQn1wBA6V-gN2usWegS=oq=6ysA8c2BJ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] cgroupd really do work!
From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 6c16accd-09c8-42cb-84cd-780eaa3e27ea
X-Archives-Hash: d8f88fbd4624e7781e321732ccbd5506
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 4:41 PM, William Kenworthy <billk@iinet.net.au> wrot=
e:
> Re the discussion on cgroups on the 24/25 november - on my old AMD
> barton 2500+ desktop - in the past a load of anything more than 5 made
> it very painful to use. =C2=A0Add in running windows in a qemu vm at the =
same
> time (all in 1.5G ram) and its almost unusable as an interactive
> desktop.
>
> Now, with Florians (thanks for the scripts) version of using it on
> gentoo, even at a load in excess of 12, its almost as good as with no
> load for desktop operations!
>
> To get the high load I am compiling a new kernel, running win2k in qemu,
> emerging latest updates, browsing the web and reading email in
> evolution, running updatedb and other cron jobs (just restarted after a
> tuxonice hibernate so everything is triggering at once!).
>
> Really, really, really neat!
> BillK
Very cool indeed.
Which kernel did you choose? ck-sources? Something else?
Cheers,
Mark