From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: KH <gentoo-user@konstantinhansen.de>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] python-2.7 && python-updater
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:02:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=33P4TmoVb8E9S5n2SRCa4nH3m2HM7h+O-VCR6@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D908BAF.2090900@konstantinhansen.de>
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:22 AM, KH <gentoo-user@konstantinhansen.de> wrote:
> Am 25.03.2011 05:48, schrieb Paul Hartman:
>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> And if we should set python to 2.7, should we remove python-2.6? I don't
>>> think we want to break something, portage in particular. ;-)
>>
>> I have no trace of python-2.6 on my system at this point and I'm
>> getting along just fine with 2.7 as my active python.
>>
>
> Hi there,
>
> I do have python-2.7 and python-3.1 emerged. I just took al look in
> /usr/lib64/ and I can find trace of python2.4 python2.5 python2.6
> python2.7 python3.1 . Are those folders (2.4; 2.5; 2.6) needed anymore?
> If no, why are the still there?
>
> Regards kh
<SNIP>
I don't have anything there other than versions of python currently installed:
mark@c2stable ~ $ ls -ld /usr/lib64/pyth*
drwxr-xr-x 21 root root 20480 Feb 26 12:11 /usr/lib64/python2.6
drwxr-xr-x 24 root root 20480 Mar 26 12:08 /usr/lib64/python2.7
drwxr-xr-x 26 root root 20480 Feb 26 12:12 /usr/lib64/python3.1
mark@c2stable ~ $ eselect python list
Available Python interpreters:
[1] python2.6
[2] python2.7 *
[3] python3.1
mark@c2stable ~ $
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-28 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-25 0:11 [gentoo-user] python-2.7 && python-updater Mark Knecht
2011-03-25 0:28 ` Dale
2011-03-25 3:42 ` Amankwah
2011-03-25 4:48 ` Paul Hartman
2011-03-25 9:37 ` Dale
2011-03-25 9:50 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-03-25 13:56 ` Mark Knecht
2011-03-25 14:26 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-03-25 18:14 ` [gentoo-user] humor: " James
2011-03-25 14:33 ` [gentoo-user] " Roman Zilka
2011-03-25 16:44 ` Dale
2011-03-25 14:33 ` Paul Hartman
2011-03-25 16:46 ` Dale
2011-03-28 13:22 ` KH
2011-03-28 15:02 ` Mark Knecht [this message]
2011-03-28 15:41 ` Roman Zilka
2011-03-29 8:26 ` KH
2011-03-25 13:02 ` [gentoo-user] " Simon Siemonsma
2011-03-25 16:50 ` Dale
2011-03-25 19:09 ` [gentoo-user] " Stéphane Guedon
2011-03-25 19:21 ` Grant
2011-03-25 20:38 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-03-26 19:10 ` Mark Knecht
2011-03-26 19:22 ` Mick
2011-03-26 19:56 ` Mark Knecht
2011-03-26 20:36 ` Bill Longman
2011-03-26 20:53 ` Mark Knecht
2011-03-26 21:12 ` Mick
2011-03-26 21:16 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-03-26 21:33 ` Mark Knecht
2011-03-26 23:06 ` Adam Carter
2011-03-27 0:44 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-03-27 15:26 ` Mark Knecht
2011-03-27 15:47 ` Jacques Montier
2011-03-27 19:25 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-03-27 19:50 ` Mark Knecht
2011-03-27 20:05 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-03-28 0:45 ` Adam Carter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTi=33P4TmoVb8E9S5n2SRCa4nH3m2HM7h+O-VCR6@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=markknecht@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@konstantinhansen.de \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox