From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ozvhp-0000fA-62 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:12:23 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F3406E09E0 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:12:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qy0-f181.google.com (mail-qy0-f181.google.com [209.85.216.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 664CAE08A1 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:50:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk33 with SMTP id 33so6586016qyk.19 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:50:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=MXobftbBob9/wV12EBx5zJJ+Qfohx2MPx/+H8n6TpbI=; b=HyK2FOi9F06aCrEqD+GVPZTgdJIZSWYXYVyaHcGnI/Im+dUGVGBROhC6kK5AYpMusJ hT+kQMWxBIY+A/nleEqcqvrYON4NrH6dI5WbjeKch/k/1IOeJ0vJ27KhDqw1KMmEMmpu +iW86WuLTgdee51VShg14QQucjOwrSFtw/XrQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=qO3rgoR+Ubo17pzdEC3Q2b9mvms3ZSwTTtNQLCAmZ7Cw1lyEQO5EQ/kpZj2R/cP2Vr EF/WOhpQmnHjQId8dvaFsey7IFgO1uvoIObczltM3qWZqV85kFeHXC+nBkDTKCd4Rv3F hk5bntta4alBSbx8myV0OXe7tW81bmP1he76Q= Received: by 10.220.124.213 with SMTP id v21mr1919082vcr.215.1285523425807; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:50:25 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: jz.penguin@gmail.com Received: by 10.220.176.131 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:50:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: James Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:50:03 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Cv4VaZt-JIeRlios50t0BD8ui3A Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] iwl5000 firmware fails to load To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 60917473-5157-4db2-90f9-a55efac375d9 X-Archives-Hash: d98bf19803ee861d41da4cb3a840e45b Running 2.6.35-r8. I suspected hal, as well. If I look through my /var/log/dmesg output, the load messages are almost identical to yours before I emerge the set. Unfortunately unmerging and re-emerging hal didn't seem to do anything. Then again -- would hal really have anything to do with the kernel loading the firmware? Hal shouldn't even be started by that point. -j On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 4:23 AM, Adam Carter wrote: > For reference here's mine > iwlagn: Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link AGN driver for Linux, in-tree: > iwlagn: Copyright(c) 2003-2010 Intel Corporation > iwlagn 0000:04:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17 > iwlagn 0000:04:00.0: setting latency timer to 64 > iwlagn 0000:04:00.0: Detected Intel Wireless WiFi Link 5100AGN REV=0x54 > iwlagn 0000:04:00.0: Tunable channels: 13 802.11bg, 24 802.11a channels > iwlagn 0000:04:00.0: irq 32 for MSI/MSI-X > iwlagn 0000:04:00.0: firmware: requesting iwlwifi-5000-2.ucode > iwlagn 0000:04:00.0: loaded firmware version 8.24.2.12 > > Side note - If your system is pcie then you should turn on the MSI kernel > options. > > I have no idea really - tho out of the software you installed before the > breakage, Hal would have to be the biggest suspect. Maybe stop it form > starting at boot and reboot to see what happens?? (FWIW im running hald) I > assume you've added the hal use flag and done an emerge with newuse? > > What kernel are you running? > > >