From: <burlingk@cv63.navy.mil>
To: <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 09:13:18 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AA0639A1EB70AE409130258CE7BDC3183237E9@messenger.cv63.navy.mil> (raw)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Farrell [mailto:dan@spore.ath.cx]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 12:27 AM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question
>
>
> Not to mention you will spend much longer waiting for
> everything to download then you'd have to wait for everything
> do download on demand. It would probably be more desirable
> for you to keep a network-shared distfiles than mirror the
> servers. Then there's the age-old 'static hosts file'
> problem - just like the giant host file describing everyone
> took longer to transfer than to become outdated back in the
> glorious days of UNIX, it will also probably take longer to
> dowload all distfiles ever than it will for those distfiles
> to become outdated. In conclusion, I think this is a rather
> silly idea.
> --
You are right I think.
If nothing else the handbook says that Gentoo etiquite says not
to rsync your portage tree more than once a day. For the average
distro, once a week or even once a month is more than sufficient
to keep up with the packages in the main branch.
I think that I will probably be better off doing a stage three
install, then doing an 'emerge -euD world' or similar before
moving on from there. After that, I can just make sure to watch
the FAQ's and walkthroughs when I install Xorg to make sure that
I do it right. ^_^
Hopefully by the time I build the machine, either A) I can get
a decent nVidia card, or B) the ATI drivers will be released. ^_^
I preffer nVidia, but if the ATI drivers go open source (crossing
my fingers but not holding my breath), then that will be a good
option as well.
^_^
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next reply other threads:[~2007-05-23 0:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-23 0:13 burlingk [this message]
2007-05-23 0:21 ` [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question Bo Ørsted Andresen
2007-05-23 8:25 ` Neil Bothwick
2007-05-23 0:25 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-05-23 0:46 ` Dale
2007-05-23 0:57 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-05-23 2:37 ` Dale
2007-05-23 8:22 ` Neil Bothwick
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-23 1:40 burlingk
2007-05-22 7:42 burlingk
2007-05-22 8:18 ` Neil Bothwick
2007-05-22 7:13 burlingk
2007-05-22 7:26 ` Dan Farrell
2007-05-22 6:47 burlingk
2007-05-22 7:02 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-05-22 5:13 burlingk
2007-05-22 4:55 burlingk
2007-05-22 4:06 burlingk
2007-05-22 4:30 ` Iain Buchanan
2007-05-22 5:01 ` Naga
2007-05-22 5:23 ` Dale
2007-05-22 5:39 ` Iain Buchanan
2007-05-22 6:30 ` Naga
2007-05-22 13:03 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2007-05-22 6:34 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-05-22 15:27 ` Dan Farrell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AA0639A1EB70AE409130258CE7BDC3183237E9@messenger.cv63.navy.mil \
--to=burlingk@cv63.navy.mil \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox