From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HrTze-0001No-P9 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 May 2007 07:13:47 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4P7CUGG000907; Fri, 25 May 2007 07:12:30 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l4P78LcC028722 for ; Fri, 25 May 2007 07:08:21 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB5E3647BE for ; Fri, 25 May 2007 07:08:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: 1.306 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.306 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.276, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.479, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_REAL_NAME=0.55] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2H-ecSRtwqqu for ; Fri, 25 May 2007 07:08:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dnsmail4.fleet.navy.mil (pacfb.fleet.navy.mil [205.56.145.36]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7068364140 for ; Fri, 25 May 2007 07:08:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from VSCAN3 ([157.153.3.104]) by dnsmail4.fleet.navy.mil (8.12.11.SSC-RH.1/8.12.9) with SMTP id l4P77p33013831 for ; Fri, 25 May 2007 07:08:15 GMT Received: from cv63ucsex1.cv63.navy.mil ([157.153.3.104]) by VSCAN3 (SMSSMTP 4.1.11.41) with SMTP id M2007052507081613952 for ; Fri, 25 May 2007 07:08:17 GMT content-class: urn:content-classes:message Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C79E9C.1A49D369" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 Subject: [gentoo-user] Semi OT: 64 bit processors, the Linux Kernel, and x86 Gentoo. Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 16:12:49 +0900 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Semi OT: 64 bit processors, the Linux Kernel, and x86 Gentoo. Thread-Index: AceenBpIop2cZylLSBCuppzmclPvwA== From: To: X-Archives-Salt: 6c50eec1-a6b1-4755-97f1-4195ce1e70bd X-Archives-Hash: 17fc0cc42fa45eb57b368bd436fd39ae This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C79E9C.1A49D369 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Due to issues with some of the software I am wanting to run, when it is run under the AMD64 bit version of Gentoo (one of which is Blender, which I hope will be properly stable soon), I am planning to run x86 Gentoo (With the i686 stage3) on an AMD64 processor. =20 My question is this, If I enabel 64 bit support in the kernel, is that likely to cause any issues with running the 32bit compiled software? =20 =20 V/r RP3(SW) Burling Religious Ministries x4502 =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C79E9C.1A49D369 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Due to = issues with=20 some of the software I am wanting to run, when it is run under the AMD64 = bit=20 version of Gentoo (one of which is Blender, which I hope will be = properly=20 stable soon), I am planning to run x86 Gentoo (With the i686 stage3) on = an AMD64=20 processor.
 
My = question is this,=20 If I enabel 64 bit support in the kernel, is that likely to cause any = issues=20 with running the 32bit compiled software?
 
 
V/r
RP3(SW) = Burling
Religious = Ministries
x4502
 
=00 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C79E9C.1A49D369-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list