From: <burlingk@cv63.navy.mil>
To: <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 15:47:46 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AA0639A1EB70AE409130258CE7BDC31806646AE7@messenger.cv63.navy.mil> (raw)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hemmann, Volker Armin
> [mailto:volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 3:34 PM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question
>
>
> On Dienstag, 22. Mai 2007, burlingk@cv63.navy.mil wrote:
> > Ok, Here goes...
> >
> >
> > How large is the package archive for gentoo, assuming a
> full copy of
> > the portage tree, and all of the source tarballs in the distfiles
> > directory of the average server?
>
> dunno, but huge.
<snip>
> you will waste a lot of bandwidth and diskspace. The mirror
> might hate you for
> it. You will have lots and lots of packages like packageX.1.1,
> packageX.1.1.0, packageX.1.1.1....
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
I think that a better option may be to decide which software I want,
and use emerge -ef <package> on each of the big packages to get just
what I need. Maybe setting up a stage three install, with just the
kernel, boot loader, and portage and using 'emerge -ef world' first
might have the desired effect as far as getting the base system first.
:-)
That would also let me make sure that I have an up to date portage tree,
and just the files I need and maybe a few more. ^^;;
Does that sound better, and less likely to piss off the mirrors? :P
---
Ken
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next reply other threads:[~2007-05-22 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-22 6:47 burlingk [this message]
2007-05-22 7:02 ` [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-05-22 8:07 ` [gentoo-user] " »Q«
2007-05-22 8:39 ` Neil Bothwick
2007-05-22 9:05 ` »Q«
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-23 1:40 [gentoo-user] " burlingk
2007-05-23 0:13 burlingk
2007-05-23 0:21 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2007-05-23 8:25 ` Neil Bothwick
2007-05-23 0:25 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-05-23 0:46 ` Dale
2007-05-23 0:57 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-05-23 2:37 ` Dale
2007-05-23 8:22 ` Neil Bothwick
2007-05-22 7:42 burlingk
2007-05-22 8:18 ` Neil Bothwick
2007-05-22 7:13 burlingk
2007-05-22 7:26 ` Dan Farrell
2007-05-22 5:13 burlingk
2007-05-22 4:55 burlingk
2007-05-22 4:06 burlingk
2007-05-22 4:30 ` Iain Buchanan
2007-05-22 5:01 ` Naga
2007-05-22 5:23 ` Dale
2007-05-22 5:39 ` Iain Buchanan
2007-05-22 6:30 ` Naga
2007-05-22 13:03 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2007-05-22 6:34 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-05-22 15:27 ` Dan Farrell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AA0639A1EB70AE409130258CE7BDC31806646AE7@messenger.cv63.navy.mil \
--to=burlingk@cv63.navy.mil \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox