From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F181391DB for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 11:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C55B1E0C27; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 11:27:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpout.karoo.kcom.com (smtpout.karoo.kcom.com [212.50.160.34]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931C4E0C06 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 11:27:25 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,660,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="69527435" Received: from unknown (HELO compaq.stroller.uk.eu.org) ([213.152.39.89]) by smtpout.karoo.kcom.com with ESMTP; 15 Mar 2014 11:27:24 +0000 Received: from [192.168.11.101] (unknown [192.168.11.101]) by compaq.stroller.uk.eu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58F5AC6EC for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 11:23:01 +0000 (GMT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\)) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] MD5SUM From: Stroller In-Reply-To: <201403151116.54652.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 11:26:52 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <1943371394633639@web21m.yandex.ru> <1394640063.613.2.camel@desktop> <201403151116.54652.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874) X-Archives-Salt: 1f6dfde7-dbb9-428e-8ba2-3a4a17fbcb61 X-Archives-Hash: 39883fb50282fe01af33568a5a3f979c On Sat, 15 March 2014, at 11:16 am, Mick = wrote: > On Saturday 15 Mar 2014 11:06:22 Stroller wrote: >> On Wed, 12 March 2014, at 4:01 pm, Francesco Turco = =20 > wrote: >>>> is the published MD5-hash still valid? >>>=20 >>> $ md5sum livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso >>> e86da868be423283ec167725390faefc = livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso >>>=20 >>> Yes, the published MD5 hash is still valid. >>=20 >> Since this thread seems to have taken on a life of its own, and = because >> no-one else has done so, I just wanted to check in and say this is = the >> md5sum I'm getting, too. >>=20 >> I was careful to use the switch.ch URL that Guido gave in his first >> message. >=20 > Ha! Could it be that the mirror has a corrupt iso, or is the DIGEST = file=20 > hashes wrong?! Well, that's why I used the same URL given by Guido - I get a different = md5sum from him. Whichever mirror Francesco used, I get the same md5sum that he posted. Stroller.