* Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Which desktop antivirus?
@ 2011-10-30 12:35 99% ` Mick
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Mick @ 2011-10-30 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 831 bytes --]
On Saturday 22 Oct 2011 21:31:32 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 20:03:44 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > ClamVM has poor detection rates. You might want to look into AVG Free
> > for Linux.
>
> Do you have any documentation for this?
>
> I'm not saying you're wrong, rather that I'd like to know more.
This is not current, but if it is to be believed (and without details on the
methodology I'd be reluctant to believe it) clamav came 2nd after Karspersky:
http://www.builderau.com.au/blogs/byteclub/viewblogpost.htm?p=339270831
This on the other hand is both current and more meaningful, because it
includes zero day attacks:
http://www.shadowserver.org/wiki/pmwiki.php/AV/VirusDailyStats
ClamAV on linux comes 3rd for zero day attacks and 16th on retries.
--
Regards,
Mick
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2011-10-22 11:27 [gentoo-user] Which desktop antivirus? Mick
2011-10-22 17:03 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2011-10-22 20:31 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-10-30 12:35 99% ` Mick
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox