* Re: [gentoo-user] Linux Fiber SAN
@ 2013-06-12 14:53 99% ` Alan McKinnon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Alan McKinnon @ 2013-06-12 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 12/06/2013 16:20, Nick Khamis wrote:
> It was my understanding that SAN whether implemented using iSCSI
> or Fibre was essentially susceptible to the same type
> of faults that lead to whatever failures?
Old cynic speaking here:
Yes, they both have the same weak point: humans.
In my experience the only storage technology that ever let me down badly
was a decrepit Arena locally-attached badly designed POS.
The humans that *run* the storage failed me many times. The SAN never
deleted a LUN, the humans did - more than once.
If you are assessing risk, do keep that one in mind.
Other than that, no storage technology is really inherently better than
any other, some are just better suited to what you need and have budget for.
--
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckinnon@gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2013-06-11 14:19 [gentoo-user] Linux Fiber SAN Nick Khamis
2013-06-12 4:57 ` Norman Rieß
2013-06-12 14:20 ` Nick Khamis
2013-06-12 14:53 99% ` Alan McKinnon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox