* Re: [gentoo-user] OOO and parallel compiling
@ 2006-10-25 14:49 99% ` Uwe Thiem
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Uwe Thiem @ 2006-10-25 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user; +Cc: Dirk Heinrichs
On 25 October 2006 16:00, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 25. Oktober 2006 14:24 schrieb ext Uwe Thiem:
> > I am compiling OOO 2.0.4 currently and am somehow surprised. Checking the
> > ebuild shows that it still sets JOBS="1" but it *does* use distcc in my
> > setup. At least parts of OOO are compiled on another box. It never did
> > that before. Did I misread the ebuild?
>
> So how is using distcc and jobs=1 contrary? If you have configured portage
> to use distcc and have distcc configured to only use the remote machine, no
> matter how many jobs yoou start, they will end up on the remote (unless
> distcc itself decides it's not worthwhile).
I compiles OOO on both boxes in parallel. Actually, it just finished without
error while I was typing this. And yes, the compile run was much faster than
any other before.
Uwe
--
Mark Twain: I rather decline two drinks than a German adjective.
http://www.SysEx.com.na
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2006-10-25 12:24 [gentoo-user] OOO and parallel compiling Uwe Thiem
2006-10-25 14:00 ` Dirk Heinrichs
2006-10-25 14:49 99% ` Uwe Thiem
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox