* Re: [gentoo-user] Question about /etc/conf.d/net entry
@ 2007-02-02 17:33 99% ` Michal 'vorner' Vaner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Michal 'vorner' Vaner @ 2007-02-02 17:33 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 991 bytes --]
Hello,
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 12:07:59PM -0500, Shawn Singh wrote:
> I've got my /etc/conf.d/net setup as follows:
>
> # eth1 (LAN) config
> config_eth1=( "192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255" )
> routes_eth1=( "192.168.1.0 via 192.168.1.1" ) # the idea here is that I wish
Er, shouldn't this work by default? It is the netmask thing, right?
Because what I think you are trying to do is:
Whatever goes to 192.168.1.*, send it to the machine at 192.168.1.1, it
will know. But the problem IMO is, this machine is local, so it again
runs the packet trough the table and sends it to itself…
Did you try removing the routing rule? I guess it should work by itself
and you needed it only if there was a machine somewhere, like 10.0.0.1
that would be reachable trough 192.168.1.15…
But I'm not sure, I hope I do not talk complete jebrish.
--
The cost of living is going up, and the chance of living is going down.
Michal 'vorner' Vaner
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2007-02-02 17:07 [gentoo-user] Question about /etc/conf.d/net entry Shawn Singh
2007-02-02 17:33 99% ` Michal 'vorner' Vaner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox